神经反射
注意缺陷多动障碍
随机对照试验
安慰剂
临床全球印象
致盲
不利影响
医学
心理学
物理疗法
听力学
儿科
精神科
内科学
脑电图
替代医学
病理
作者
L. Eugene Arnold,Martijn Arns,Justin A. Barterian,Rachel Bergman,Sarah R. Black,C. Keith Conners,Shea Connor,Sudeshna Dasgupta,Roger J. DeBeus,Teryll Higgins,Laurence Hirshberg,Jill A. Hollway,Cynthia R. Kerson,Howard Lightstone,Nicholas Lofthouse,Joel F. Lubar,Keith McBurnett,Vincent J. Monastra,Kristin A. Buchan-Page,Xueliang Jeff Pan
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.906
摘要
Objective To determine whether theta/beta-ratio (TBR) electroencephalographic biofeedback (neurofeedback [NF]) has a specific effect on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) beyond nonspecific benefit. Method In a 2-site double-blind randomized clinical trial, 144 children aged 7 to 10 years with rigorously diagnosed moderate/severe ADHD and theta/beta-ratio (TBR) ≥4.5 were randomized 3:2 to deliberate TBR downtraining versus a control of equal duration, intensity, and appearance. Two early dropouts left 142 children for modified intent-to-treat analysis. The control used prerecorded electroencephalograms with the participant’s artifacts superimposed. Treatment was programmed via Internet by an off-site statistician-guided co-investigator. Fidelity was 98.7% by trainers/therapists and 93.2% by NF expert monitor. The primary outcome was parent- and teacher-rated inattention; analysis was mixed-effects regression. Because the expense and effort of NF can be justified only by enduring benefit, follow-ups were integrated. Results Blinding was excellent. Although both groups showed significant improvement (p Conclusion This study does not support a specific effect of deliberate TBR NF at either treatment end or 13-month follow-up. Participants will be reassessed at 25-month follow-up. Clinical trial registration information Double-Blind 2-Site Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for ADHD; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; NCT02251743.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI