青贮饲料
微生物菌剂
肉牛
干物质
饲料
食品科学
发酵
筒仓
动物科学
农学
生物
细菌
遗传学
作者
Guilherme Lobato Menezes,Alan Figueiredo de Oliveira,Frederico Patrus Ananias de Assis Pires,L. C. Gonçalves,Rafael Araújo de Menezes,Pamella Grossi de Sousa,Paulo Henrique Arruda de Medeiros,Matheus Morais de Pinho,Ângela Maria Quintão Lana,Vânia Eloísa de Araújo,Diogo Gonzaga Jayme
摘要
Abstract The effects of different additives on farm‐scale silage quality and beef cattle performance are inconsistent. This study aimed to carry out a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy of chemical and microbial additives to silage on beef cattle performance. Systematic searches were performed using databases and scientific journals, and 42 articles were selected. Data for all variables were grouped into subgroups according to the additive type. For dry matter intake and average daily gain, the data were also grouped by forage type due to greater comparison numbers. The treatment mean differences and 95% confidence intervals ( p < 0.05) were analysed using a random‐effects model. The use of homo‐ and heterofermentative microbial inoculant mixtures and chemical additives (Ch) increased the average daily gain of beef cattle fed maize/sorghum silage. Homofermentative microbial inoculant (Ho), Ch, and a mixture of microbial inoculant and chemical additives also increased the average daily gain of beef cattle fed temperate grasses. Only Ch increased dry matter intake. Ch increased feed efficiency, and Ch and Ho increased carcass weight. The evaluated additives improved the silage fermentation process mainly via pH and ammonia nitrogen reduction. Overall, this meta‐analysis demonstrated that silage additives improved the ensiling process and beef cattle performance, with better results with Ch use. Due to the aerobic stability and microbiological profile analyses being carried out more in laboratory‐scale silos, more studies are needed to determine these silage parameters after opening the silo at the farm scale.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI