Multidisease classification of CT reports using traditional natural language processing and a lightweight foundation model

基础(证据) 计算机科学 自然语言处理 人工智能 自然语言 历史 考古
作者
Michael E. Garcia-Alcsoer,Fakrul Islam Tushar,Mobina Ghojoghnejad,Geoffrey D. Rubin,Joseph Yuan-Chieh Lo
标识
DOI:10.1117/12.3047690
摘要

Natural language processing (NLP) methods can annotate free-text radiology reports to create large datasets at the scale of an entire health system or beyond. Generalizing the disease classification across multiple organ systems inherently requires a complex, robust, and accurate classification model. Concurrently, NLP methods have significantly improved and become more sophisticated. This study compares two traditional NLP methods, a rule-based algorithm (RBA) and a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory network (BiLSTM), with a lightweight variant of the Large Language Model Meta AI (Llama) model. Our goal is to analyze the capabilities and limitations of each model in accurately classifying diseases encountered within the chest, abdominal, and pelvic computed tomography (CT) exams of the body. Rule-based algorithms (RBAs) were used to extract disease labels from the “findings” section of CT radiology reports, creating the training, validation, and testing datasets. Disease labels were made for three organ systems: the lungs/pleura, liver/gallbladder, and kidneys/ureters. A BiLSTM network with an attention mechanism was trained on 151,431 cases and tested on 85,987 cases. The BiLSTM and Meta’s Llama3.1-8B model was evaluated on the RBA-test set and a manually annotated dataset. On the smaller, manually labeled test set, the RBA model achieved the highest macro F1 score (0.94), followed by the BiLSTM (0.91) and then Llama (0.89). In contrast, on the larger RBA-labeled test set, the BiLSTM maintained high performance (average AUC>0.98; macro F1=0.95), while Llama’s macro F1 dropped to 0.65. Manual spot checking of reports where Llama disagreed with RBA/BiLSTM revealed numerous instances in which Llama was actually correct, indicating flaws with the previous RBA labeling. This study emphasizes the limitations of rule-based approaches and the need to consider clinical context in ambiguous scenarios. Llama3.1-8B exhibits the potential to outperform rule-based methods, indicating promise for reliable, large-scale multi-disease classification in CT text reports.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
竹音完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
1秒前
Oscillator发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
平安完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
吴洲凤完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zyyz616完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
充电宝的应助被lixu采纳,获得10
3秒前
三块钱土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被晴天采纳,获得10
3秒前
aaaKumaINmyMIND的应助被pengdaiyun采纳,获得10
4秒前
香蕉若南发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
端庄南烟发布了新的文献求助100
4秒前
5秒前
djbj2022发布了新的文献求助100
5秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
乐乐的应助被小甜菜采纳,获得10
7秒前
Chencw6完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
9秒前
东风吹完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
妮妮发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被free_siemens采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
知性的悲完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
东风吹发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Shopping完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
晨阳发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
Chenyu关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
小甜菜发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
陆康完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Guidelines for fracture-safe and fatigue-reliable design of steel structures 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8026262
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9467619
关于积分的说明 21227262
捐赠科研通 7597163
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3387560
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2520154
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2423956