Patient-controlled analgesia morphine for the management of acute pain in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 吗啡 急诊科 剂量 急性疼痛 麻醉 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 疼痛评估 安慰剂 疼痛管理 内科学 替代医学 精神科 病理
作者
Muhammad Baihaqi Oon,Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab Rahman,Mohd Noor Norhayati,Mohd Boniami Yazid
出处
期刊:International Journal of Emergency Medicine [BioMed Central]
卷期号:17 (1) 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00615-3
摘要

Abstract Background The ideal pain control approach is typically viewed as titration of analgesia for pain reduction and periodic pain evaluation. However, this method takes time and is not always possible in the crowded Emergency Department. Therefore, an alternative way to improve pain care in the Emergency Department is needed to avoid this unpleasant sensation in the patients. The best solution to tackle this situation is using Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA), in the form of a PCA pump. Study objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis was designated to evaluate the efficacy of PCA morphine in treating acute pain at Emergency Department. Methods We searched databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, and Google Scholar up to February 2022 and identified randomized controlled trials with English language only that compare PCA morphine to IV morphine in treating patients presenting with acute pain at Emergency Department. Results Eight trials were included in our review, comprising 1490 participants. We compared PCA morphine vs. IV morphine. There were no differences in the pain score between PCA and IV morphine (standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.20, p = 0.25). Further subgroup analyses (origin of the pain, time of assessment and the durations) showed no difference except for the dosages as the PCA morphine reduced the pain compared to IV morphine in low and high dosages but only two studies were involved. However, the analysis showed PCA morphine increased patient satisfaction and reduced the number of patients who required additional analgesia compared to IV morphine (MD 0.12, P < 0.001), (MD 0.47, P < 0.001) respectively. Data obtained in this review pertaining to adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and drowsiness is limited since not all the trials reported the events. Conclusions PCA morphine do appear to have a beneficial effect on the outcome of patient satisfaction and the number of patients who required additional analgesia. However, further studies targeting a larger sample size is required to increase the certainty of the evidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
竹子完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
天天发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
lcy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
FashionBoy应助小高同学采纳,获得10
3秒前
ivy完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
李新光完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
独特成威完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
苏尔完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
任性茉莉完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
coolkid完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
西瘡完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
10秒前
Chikit完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
JamesPei应助独特的从露采纳,获得10
14秒前
sisi发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
粱忆寒完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
栗荔完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
仁爱水之完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
Reese完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
shor0414完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
落忆完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
沉静的友灵完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
所所应助sisi采纳,获得10
28秒前
笨笨芯发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
31秒前
无私的芸遥完成签到,获得积分20
35秒前
35秒前
36秒前
WMT完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
木木木木完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
忧伤的八宝粥完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
尹沐完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
42秒前
xieji发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
42秒前
Michael_li完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
茶色玻璃发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
Niniiii完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
JQKing完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
51秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3779389
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3324920
关于积分的说明 10220490
捐赠科研通 3040099
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668560
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798721
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758522