可用性
计算机科学
多样性(控制论)
评价方法
风险分析(工程)
可靠性工程
医学
人机交互
人工智能
工程类
作者
H. Rex Hartson,Terence S. Andre,Robert C. Williges
标识
DOI:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1304_03
摘要
The current variety of alternative approaches to usability evaluation methods (UEMs) designed to assess and improve usability in software systems is offset by a general lack of understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each. Practitioners need to know which methods are more effective and in what ways and for what purposes. However, UEMs cannot be evaluated and compared reliably because of the lack of standard criteria for comparison. In this article, we present a practical discussion of factors, comparison criteria, and UEM performance measures useful in studies comparing UEMs. In demonstrating the importance of developing appropriate UEM evaluation criteria, we offer operational definitions and possible measures of UEM performance. We highlight specific challenges that researchers and practitioners face in comparing UEMs and provide a point of departure for further discussion and refinement of the principles and techniques used to approach UEM evaluation and comparison.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI