医学
物理疗法
肺康复
康复
等价(形式语言)
物理医学与康复
随机对照试验
肺病
临床试验
健康
最小临床重要差异
梅德林
呼吸道疾病
生活质量(医疗保健)
肺功能测试
作者
Sarah E Brown,Sally Wootton,Marita Dale,Jennifer Alison,Andrew S. L. Chan,Marlien Varnfield,Ian A. Yang,Michelle Cunich,Zoe McKeough
出处
期刊:Thorax
[BMJ]
日期:2025-09-24
卷期号:81 (4): 302-310
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222823
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) is a novel model of care that may overcome barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) access. This study determined if mHealth PR was equivalent to centre-based PR (CB-PR) in improving exercise capacity and health status in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHOD: Single-blinded, multicentre, randomised controlled equivalence trial using an intention-to-treat analysis. Participants completed 8 weeks of either mHealth PR, using the mobile PR (m-PR) application and supported by telephone calls, or CB-PR. Co-primary outcomes, measured at baseline and end-intervention, were change in 6 minute walk distance (6MWD) and COPD assessment test (CAT) score, with an equivalence margin of 30 m and 2 points, respectively. RESULTS: 55 (14) % predicted) with 38 m-PR participants and 42 CB-PR participants completing at least one primary outcome. At end-intervention, there was no between-group difference in 6MWD (mean difference (MD) 13 m, 95% CI -6 to 31), indicating equivalence of m-PR to CB-PR. There was a significant between-group difference in CAT score (MD -4.9 points, 95% CI -7.2 to -2.6), with both limits of the CI exceeding the equivalence margin, indicating superiority of m-PR. CONCLUSION: An mHealth PR programme resulted in equivalent improvements in exercise capacity and superior improvements in health status when compared with CB-PR in people with COPD. mHealth PR could be effective as a management option for people with COPD with adequate digital literacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001253190.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI