可解释性
结构效度
物理疗法
标准效度
可靠性(半导体)
患者报告的结果
内容有效性
医学
生活质量(医疗保健)
评定量表
心理学
物理医学与康复
心理测量学
临床心理学
人工智能
发展心理学
计算机科学
物理
护理部
功率(物理)
量子力学
作者
Lisa T. Hoglund,David A. Scalzitti,Dhinu J. Jayaseelan,Lori A. Bolgla,Susan Wainwright
标识
DOI:10.2519/jospt.2023.11730
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to appraise the construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess function and pain in adults and adolescents with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review of measurement properties LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 6, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that assessed the measurement properties of English-language PROMs for PFP and their cultural adaptations and translations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, we determined overall ratings and quality of evidence for construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. We extracted data related to interpretability for clinical use. RESULTS: After screening 7066 titles, 61 studies for 33 PROMs were included. Only 2 PROMs had evidence of “sufficient” or “indeterminate” quality for all measurement properties. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score patellofemoral subscale (KOOS-PF) had “low” to “high” quality evidence for a rating of “sufficient” for 4 measurement properties. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) had very low–quality evidence for a “sufficient” rating for 4 measurement properties. The KOOS-PF and LEFS were rated “indeterminate” for structural validity and internal consistency. The KOOS-PF had the best interpretability with reported minimal important change and 0% ceiling and floor effects. No studies examined cross-cultural validity. CONCLUSION: The KOOS-PF and LEFS had the strongest measurement properties among PROMs used for PFP. More research is needed, particularly regarding structural validity and interpretability of PROMs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):460–479. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11730
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI