酒精使用障碍
荟萃分析
基线(sea)
医学
酒
无刺
系统回顾
梅德林
内科学
纳曲酮
化学
海洋学
生物化学
受体
类阿片
政治学
法学
地质学
作者
Roberta Agabio,Hugo López‐Pelayo,Pol Bruguera,San‐Yuan Huang,Salvatore Sardo,Marta Peciña,Evgeny Krupitsky,Garrett M. Fitzmaurice,Zhicheng Lin
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107454
摘要
Baseline severity of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is an influencing factor in the response to medications recommended for the treatment of AUD. The scarce efficacy of AUD medications partly justifies their limited uses. We were interested in evaluating the efficacy of approved and recommended AUD medications using generic inverse-variance, an analysis facilitating comparison between medications and placebo both at the end of the study and, concomitantly, to baseline values for the same participants. We conducted a systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any medication to placebo providing, both at baseline and end of treatment, percent heavy drinking days (%HDD), percent drinking days (%DD), and/or drinks per drinking day (DDD). We searched PubMed, Embase, PMC, and three CT registers from inception to April 2023. A total of 79 RCTs (11,737 AUD participants; 30 different medications) were included: 47 RCTs (8465 participants) used AUD medications, and 32 RCTs (3272 participants) used other medications. At baseline, participants consumed on average approximately 12 DDD, and experienced 70 % DD, and 61 % HDD. Placebo halved or reduced these values to a third. Compared to placebo, AUD medications further reduced these outcomes (moderate to high certainty evidence). Other medications reduced the DDD without modifying other alcohol outcomes. AUD medications increased the risk of developing adverse events (high-certainty evidence). Despite the large placebo effects, our results support the benefits of providing AUD medications to people with AUD, helping them reduce alcohol consumption.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI