Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel

医学 指南 麻醉学 止痛药 审查 严厉 科学证据 系统回顾 德尔菲法 循证医学 随机对照试验 梅德林 分级(工程) 批判性评价 医学教育 家庭医学 人口 德尔菲 替代医学 外科 病理 操作系统 工程类 法学 计算机科学 政治学 环境卫生 认识论 数学 几何学 土木工程 统计 哲学
作者
Stefan J. Schaller,Flora T. Scheffenbichler,Thomas Bein,Manfred Blobner,Julius J. Grunow,Uwe Hamsen,Carsten Hermes,Arnold Kaltwasser,Heidrun Lewald,Peter Nydahl,Anett Reißhauer,Leonie Renzewitz,K Siemon,Thomas Staudinger,Roman Ullrich,Steffen Weber‐Carstens,Hermann Wrigge,Dominik Zergiebel,Sina M. Coldewey
出处
期刊:Intensive Care Medicine [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:50 (8): 1211-1227 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00134-024-07532-2
摘要

A scientific panel was created consisting of 23 interdisciplinary and interprofessional experts in intensive care medicine, physiotherapy, nursing care, surgery, rehabilitative medicine, and pneumology delegated from scientific societies together with a patient representative and a delegate from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies who advised methodological implementation. The guideline was created according to the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), based on The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. The topics of (early) mobilisation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, assist devices for mobilisation, and positioning, including prone positioning, were identified as areas to be addressed and assigned to specialist expert groups, taking conflicts of interest into account. The panel formulated PICO questions (addressing the population, intervention, comparison or control group as well as the resulting outcomes), conducted a systematic literature review with abstract screening and full-text analysis and created summary tables. This was followed by grading the evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence and a risk of bias assessment. The recommendations were finalized according to GRADE and voted using an online Delphi process followed by a final hybrid consensus conference. The German long version of the guideline was approved by the professional associations. For this English version an update of the systematic review was conducted until April 2024 and recommendation adapted based on new evidence in systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. In total, 46 recommendations were developed and research gaps addressed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
kafeidegushi发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小钱全发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
swing发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
饱满月亮发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
cruise完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
左耳钉应助尊敬的小凡采纳,获得10
3秒前
嘎嘎顺利发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
乐乐应助小牛牛妈咪采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
csuxxm完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
狗屁大侠发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Dream完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Ava应助霍冰旋采纳,获得10
6秒前
看不懂发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
..发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
7秒前
领导范儿应助yy采纳,获得10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
李金奥发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
飞飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
Certainty橙子完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
perovskite发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
略略略发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
明明明完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科研小小狐狸完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
LAN完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
潘文博发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Materials Selection in Mechanical Design 1000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Simulation of High-NA EUV Lithography 400
Metals, Minerals, and Society 400
International socialism & Australian labour : the Left in Australia, 1919-1939 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4309232
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3830969
关于积分的说明 11986965
捐赠科研通 3471161
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1903292
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 950557
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 852441