Use of an intraoperative wound protector to prevent surgical-site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: randomized clinical trial

医学 外科 随机对照试验 手术部位感染 手术伤口 临床试验 伤口感染 普通外科 内科学
作者
Matteo De Pastena,Giovanni Marchegiani,Salvatore Paiella,M. Fontana,Alessandro Esposito,L. Casetti,Erica Secchettin,Gessica Manzini,Claudio Bassi,Roberto Salvia
出处
期刊:British Journal of Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:107 (9): 1107-1113 被引量:25
标识
DOI:10.1002/bjs.11527
摘要

Abstract Background Surgical-site infection (SSI) increases treatment costs, duration of hospital stay and readmission rate after pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to assess whether a wound protector could reduce the risk of superficial incisional SSI after pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods This RCT included patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at Verona University Hospital, between 2017 and 2018. The experimental group had a dual-ring wound protector, whereas the control group had standard surgical drapes. The groups were stratified by preoperative biliary stent placement. The primary outcome was the overall rate of superficial SSI. Results An interim analysis was conducted after 212 patients had been enrolled; 22 patients (10·4 per cent) were excluded owing to inability to complete the pancreatoduodenectomy, or the need for postoperative reintervention. Some 94 patients (49·5 per cent) had a wound protector and 96 (50·5 per cent) had standard drapes. There were no differences between groups in demographics, or in intraoperative findings, pathological data or surgical outcomes. The overall superficial SSI rate was 7·4 per cent, which did not differ between groups (7 per cent in each group; P = 0·585). Subanalysis of patients with a preoperative biliary stent showed a similar outcome (superficial SSI rate 9 versus 8 per cent with wound protector versus surgical drapes respectively; P = 0·536). The trial was stopped prematurely on the grounds of futility. Conclusion Use of a wound protector did not reduce the rate of superficial SSI after pancreatoduodenectomy. Registration number: NCT03820648 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
kk完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
CipherSage应助帅气一刀采纳,获得10
刚刚
今后应助哇咔咔采纳,获得10
1秒前
LL完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
澄桦发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
馨馨的科科应助lunjianchi采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
lobster发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
TWH完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
夜将尽发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
虚幻海蓝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
狮山教授完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科目三应助鸡公煲品鉴家采纳,获得30
6秒前
寒冷悟空完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
尊敬的小凡完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
25完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
幸福大米完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
zz发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
蝰蛇发布了新的文献求助80
8秒前
8秒前
CHME发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
樱岛芳子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
SciGPT应助嗯嗯采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
lobster完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
科目三应助随风采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
banqia发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
内視鏡的に摘除しえた十二指腸乳頭部腫瘍の2例 660
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Interpolation and Regression Models for the Chemical Engineer: Solving Numerical Problems 400
The Neuroscience of Language 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7686181
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9249389
关于积分的说明 19957356
捐赠科研通 7259201
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3289356
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2446415
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2293782