Interaction vs Preorganization in Enzyme Catalysis. A Dispute That Calls for Resolution

This essay focuses on the debate between Warshel et al. (proponents of preorganization) and Menger and Nome (proponents of spatiotemporal effects) over the source of fast enzyme catalysis. The Warshel model proposes that the main function of enzymes is to push the solvent coordinate toward the transition state. Other physical-organic factors (e.g., desolvation, entropic effects, ground state destabilization, etc.) do not, ostensibly, contribute substantially to the rate. Indeed, physical organic chemistry in its entirety was claimed to be “irrelevant to an enzyme’s active site”. Preorganization had been applied by Warshel to his “flagship” enzyme, ketosteroid isomerase, but we discuss troubling issues with their ensuing analysis. For example, the concepts of “general acid” and “general base”, known to play a role in this enzyme’s mechanism, are ignored in the text. In contrast, the spatiotemporal theory postulates that enzyme-like rates ( i.e., accelerations >10 8 ) occur when two functionalities are held rigidly at contact distances less than ca . 3 Å. Numerous diverse organic systems are shown to bear this out experimentally. Many of these are intramolecular systems where distances between functionalities are known. Among them are fast intramolecular systems where strain is actually generated during the reaction, thereby excluding steric compression as a source of the observed enzyme-like rates. Finally, the account ends with structural data from four active sites of enzymes, obtained by others, all showing contact distances between substrate analogues and enzyme. To our knowledge, contact distances less than the diameter of water are found universally among enzymes, and it is to this fact that we attribute their extremely fast rates given the assumption that enzymes, whatever their particular mechanism, obey elementary chemical principles.