The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter‐associated thrombosis

外周穿刺中心静脉导管 医学 血栓形成 深静脉 外科 内科学 导管
作者
Vineet Chopra,Scott Kaatz,Annemarie Conlon,David Paje,Paul Grant,Mary A.M. Rogers,Steven J. Bernstein,Sanjay Saint,Scott A. Flanders
出处
期刊:Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:15 (10): 1951-1962 被引量:118
标识
DOI:10.1111/jth.13794
摘要

Essentials How best to quantify thrombosis risk with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) is unknown. Data from a registry were used to develop the Michigan Risk Score (MRS) for PICC thrombosis. Five risk factors were associated with PICC thrombosis and used to develop a risk score. MRS was predictive of the risk of PICC thrombosis and can be useful in clinical practice.Background Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are associated with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We developed a score to predict risk of PICC-related thrombosis. Methods Using data from the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, image-confirmed upper-extremity DVT cases were identified. A logistic, mixed-effects model with hospital-specific random intercepts was used to identify factors associated with PICC-DVT. Points were assigned to each predictor, stratifying patients into four classes of risk. Internal validation was performed by bootstrapping with assessment of calibration and discrimination of the model. Results Of 23 010 patients who received PICCs, 475 (2.1%) developed symptomatic PICC-DVT. Risk factors associated with PICC-DVT included: history of DVT; multi-lumen PICC; active cancer; presence of another CVC when the PICC was placed; and white blood cell count greater than 12 000. Four risk classes were created based on thrombosis risk. Thrombosis rates were 0.9% for class I, 1.6% for class II, 2.7% for class III and 4.7% for class IV, with marginal predicted probabilities of 0.9% (0.7, 1.2), 1.5% (1.2, 1.9), 2.6% (2.2, 3.0) and 4.5% (3.7, 5.4) for classes I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The risk classification rule was strongly associated with PICC-DVT, with odds ratios of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.19, 2.37), 2.90 (95% CI, 2.09, 4.01) and 5.20 (95% CI, 3.65, 7.42) for risk classes II, III and IV vs. risk class I, respectively. Conclusion The Michigan PICC-DVT Risk Score offers a novel way to estimate risk of DVT associated with PICCs and can help inform appropriateness of PICC insertion.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
YY完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Akim应助迷人迎曼采纳,获得10
刚刚
自由能完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
freya完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
hsy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
爱吃车厘子完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wbb123完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小蛇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Ava应助七七采纳,获得10
2秒前
kyan发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
李健应助Dora采纳,获得10
3秒前
药学小团子完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
dongli6536发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
SciGPT应助鲤鱼小熊猫采纳,获得10
5秒前
veryzhaozhao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
木木发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
6秒前
duzy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Qpasserby完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
油盐不进的四季豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
LLY完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
张好好发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
蠹鱼发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Lucas完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
533完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
欣欣发布了新的文献求助100
10秒前
1256发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Emily发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
英姑应助波霎采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
wanci应助无奈的尔白采纳,获得10
13秒前
温昕应助比奇堡大神啊采纳,获得10
13秒前
elang发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6520384
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8313350
关于积分的说明 17780555
捐赠科研通 5622453
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2927149
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1903985
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1764384