心理学
结构效度
可靠性(半导体)
考试(生物学)
经验回避
标准效度
同时有效性
测试有效性
体验式学习
内部一致性
心理测量学
社会心理学
临床心理学
焦虑
精神科
物理
数学教育
古生物学
功率(物理)
生物
量子力学
作者
Clare E. McGuiness,Ian Zajac,Carlene Wilson,Deborah Turnbull
出处
期刊:European Journal of Psychological Assessment
[Hogrefe Verlag]
日期:2017-06-28
卷期号:35 (4): 451-458
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000421
摘要
Abstract. The Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory (REIm) is a recent tool showing promise in the measurement of self-reported thinking style – preference for rational or experiential processing – and offers three-faceted measurement of the latter. We present the first short form of the measure, the REIm-13, and test its factor structure, reliability, and validity in a large community sample. Participants were N = 920 Australian adults (502 females) who completed an online survey ( N = 510 of whom participated in a follow-up survey). In addition to the REIm, participants completed a Big Five personality measure. The internal consistency of the REIm-13 was acceptable given the limited number of items (.52–.68). Furthermore, test-retest reliability was high (ρ = .64–.74) for the theorized four-factor and two-factor solutions. Construct validity was established by examining the relationship between short-form and full REIm factors (ρ = .65–.71), and the validity of composite scoring was confirmed against factor scoring. Relationship with age (a slight negative relationship to both main scales), gender (females reporting higher Experientiality, males higher Rationality), and Big Five variables largely followed previous findings, demonstrating concurrent validity. The study demonstrates that the REIm-13 provides sound measurement of thinking style.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI