免疫原性
质粒
信使核糖核酸
动力学
DNA
分子生物学
化学
细胞生物学
生物
基因
免疫学
抗原
生物化学
物理
量子力学
作者
Wanyue Zhang,Annabelle Pfeifle,Casey Lansdell,Grant E. Frahm,Jonathon Cecillon,Levi Tamming,Caroline Gravel,Jun Gao,Sathya N. Thulasi Raman,Lisheng Wang,Simon Sauvé,Michael Rosu‐Myles,Xuguang Li,Michael Johnston
出处
期刊:Vaccines
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2023-10-11
卷期号:11 (10): 1580-1580
被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.3390/vaccines11101580
摘要
In recent years, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have emerged as a revolutionary technology for vaccine delivery. LNPs serve as an integral component of mRNA vaccines by protecting and transporting the mRNA payload into host cells. Despite their prominence in mRNA vaccines, there remains a notable gap in our understanding of the potential application of LNPs for the delivery of DNA vaccines. In this study, we sought to investigate the suitability of leading LNP formulations for the delivery of plasmid DNA (pDNA). In addition, we aimed to explore key differences in the properties of popular LNP formulations when delivering either mRNA or DNA. To address these questions, we compared three leading LNP formulations encapsulating mRNA- or pDNA-encoding firefly luciferase based on potency, expression kinetics, biodistribution, and immunogenicity. Following intramuscular injection in mice, we determined that RNA-LNPs formulated with either SM-102 or ALC-0315 lipids were the most potent (all p-values < 0.01) and immunogenic (all p-values < 0.05), while DNA-LNPs formulated with SM-102 or ALC-0315 demonstrated the longest duration of signal. Additionally, all LNP formulations were found to induce expression in the liver that was proportional to the signal at the injection site (SM102: r = 0.8787, p < 0.0001; ALC0315: r = 0.9012, p < 0.0001; KC2: r = 0.9343, p < 0.0001). Overall, this study provides important insights into the differences between leading LNP formulations and their applicability to DNA- and RNA-based vaccinations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI