消费(社会学)
心理学
体验式学习
可靠性(半导体)
社会心理学
代表(政治)
消费者行为
收敛有效性
认知心理学
内部一致性
心理测量学
发展心理学
社会学
社会科学
功率(物理)
政治
物理
数学教育
量子力学
法学
政治学
作者
William J. Havlena,Morris B. Holbrook
摘要
Consumer researchers have recently turned their attention toward exploring the imaginative, emotional, and evaluative components of the consumption experience. Nevertheless, considerable work remains to be done on the emotional aspects of consumer behavior. Toward that end, this paper assesses the comparative reliabilities and validities of two competing typologies of emotion when they are applied to the representation of experiences associated with consumption activities. Specifically, independent samples of judges rated real experiential descriptions on either Mehrabian and Russell's (1974) PAD dimensions or Plutchik's (1980) emotional categories. Further, separate samples of judges evaluated artificial descriptions on the same competing frameworks. These data permit comparisons of reliability, internal validity, and external convergent validity for the two alternative schemes. The results favor Mehrabian and Russell's PAD paradigm and suggest the need for further research exploring types of emotional responses to the varieties of consumption experience.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI