微塑料
饮用水
鉴定(生物学)
环境科学
水源
水污染
水处理
环境工程
水资源管理
环境化学
化学
生态学
生物
作者
Andrew C. Johnson,Hollie Ball,Richard K. Cross,Alice A. Horton,Monika D. Jürgens,Daniel S. Read,Jes Vollertsen,Claus Svendsen
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c03211
摘要
Microplastics were characterized in eight water treatment works (WTWs) in England and Wales (UK). Sources included river water, groundwater, and an upland reservoir. Water treatment varied from disinfection, filtration, sedimentation, and activated carbon techniques. At each WTW, five repeat samples of raw and potable water and two repeat sludge samples were taken over 5 months. Microplastics in water were captured on 10 μm filters and nonplastic materials digested in the laboratory. Microplastics ≥25 μm were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared microscopy. Blanks revealed consistent polyethylene (PE), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and polypropylene (PP) contamination. Spike recoveries for 63-90 μm polyamide microplastics demonstrated 101% (standard deviation, SD 27%) and 113% (SD 15%) recovery for raw and potable waters and 52% (SD 13%) for sludge. Only four of the six WTWs sampled for raw water and only two of eight WTWs in their potable water had microplastics above the limit of quantification. Considering only the WTWs with quantifiable microplastics, then on average, 4.9 microplastic particles/L were present in raw water and only 0.00011 microplastic particles/L were present in potable water (99.99% removal). Values in waste sludge were highly variable. PE, PET, and PP were the most common polymers quantified in raw water and sludge, and polystyrene and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene were the most common polymers quantified in potable water.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI