仿形(计算机编程)
蛋白质组
质谱法
等离子体
化学
计算生物学
色谱法
计算机科学
生物
物理
生物化学
核物理学
操作系统
作者
Noora Sissala,Haris Babačić,Isabelle Rose Leo,Xiaofang Cao,Jenny Forshed,Lars E. Eriksson,Janne Lehtiö,Claudia Fredolini,Mikael Åberg,Maria Pernemalm
出处
期刊:Research Square - Research Square
日期:2025-05-05
标识
DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501601/v1
摘要
Abstract Recent advances in proteomics technologies have expanded the depth and scale of plasma proteome analyses, offering new opportunities for biomarker discovery and precision medicine. However, understanding the strengths and limitations of these technologies is crucial for study design and platform selection. We evaluated the performance and quantitative agreement of an in-depth mass spectrometry method (HiRIEF LC-MS/MS) and the Olink Explore 3072 proximity extension assay on 88 plasma samples, with 1,129 proteins analyzed with both methods. The technologies demonstrated complementary proteome coverage, high precision, and concordance in differential abundance analysis. Quantitative agreement in protein levels was moderate (median correlation 0.59, inter-quartile range 0.33–0.75), influenced by various technical factors. In addition, we introduce PeptOlink, a public resource for analyzing peptide-level quantitative agreement. Our findings highlight the complementary strengths of mass spectrometry proteomics and Olink Explore 3072, underscoring the value of combining both for comprehensive and reliable profiling of the plasma proteome.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI