适度
社会化媒体
感知
心理学
灰色(单位)
背景(考古学)
限制
用户生成的内容
社会心理学
计算机科学
万维网
生物
机械工程
放射科
工程类
古生物学
神经科学
医学
作者
Andrea Stockinger,Svenja Schäfer,Sophie Lecheler
标识
DOI:10.1177/14614448231190901
摘要
Professional content moderators are responsible for limiting the negative effects of online discussions on news platforms and social media. However, little is known about how they adjust to platform and company moderation strategies while viewing and dealing with uncivil comments. Using qualitative interviews ( N = 18), this study examines which types of comments professional moderators classify as actionable, which (automated) strategies they use to moderate them, and how these perceptions and strategies differ between organizations, platforms, and individuals. Our results show that moderators divide content requiring intervention into clearly problematic and “gray area” comments. They (automatically) delete clear cases but use interactive or motivational moderation techniques for “gray areas.” While moderators crave more advanced technologies, they deem them incapable of addressing context-heavy comments. These findings highlight the need for nuanced regulations, emphasize the crucial role of moderators in shaping public discourse, and offer practical implications for (semi-)automated content moderation strategies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI