随机对照试验
医学
医疗急救
军事人员
军事医学
毒物控制
急诊医学
外科
历史
考古
作者
Elizabeth Bridges,JoAnne D. Whitney,Debra Metter,Robert L. Burr
出处
期刊:Nursing Outlook
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2022-11-01
卷期号:70 (6): S115-S126
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2022.08.009
摘要
During military aeromedical evacuation (AE) and prolonged field care (PFC), casualties are at increased pressure injury (PI) risk. Operational PI mitigation strategies research is limited.Using multiple factors, this study examined Mepilex/LiquiCell effects on PI risk under simulated AE/PFC.Healthy adults were stratified by body fat (%) and randomized to six groups on three surfaces. Set A: Warrior Evacuation Litter Pad (WELP) with/without Mepilex; Set B: Vacuum Spine Board (VSB) with/without Mepilex; Set C: Talon litter with/without LiquiCell. Two hours supine (loaded) was needed.Sacral skin transcutaneous tissue oxygen (TcPO2), temperature, moisture, interface pressure, interleukin-1α/Total Protein.54 participants. Sets A/B: No Mepilex effects; temperature increased 2.5°C. Set C: No LiquiCell effects. Significant ΔTcPO2 (unloaded-loaded), with 100% impaired perfusion; temperature increased 1.2°C.Multiple risk factors for PI mitigating strategies must consider. Talon with increased pressure/impaired perfusion but smaller temperature/moisture changes; WELP/VSB with increased temperature/moisture but lower pressure/adequate perfusion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI