Proteomic profiling to identify therapeutics targets in glioblastoma (GBM).

2555 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with poor prognosis. Treatment at diagnosis is largely confined to surgery, radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 months and median overall survival (mOS) of 15 months. GBM tumors recur in most cases and in patients with recurrent GBM, the mOS is 6.2 months. The lack of effective therapies underscores the importance of exploring other agents. We propose that quantitating therapy-associated protein biomarkers can improve treatment personalization for GBM. Methods: 97 FFPE GBM tissues were microdissected and solubilized for mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of therapy-associated protein biomarkers in our CLIA certified lab. We quantified protein levels of MGMT, hENT1, RRM1, TOPO1 and EGFR/TUBB3 (antibody target and payload resistance markers, respectively, for anti-EGFR ADCs) simultaneously. The multiplexed assay also quantified additional 24 clinically relevant proteins. Results: 43/57 patients were predicted to respond to TMZ based on undetectable levels of MGMT, confirming wide utility of this agent. 42/97(43%) patients were predicted to have gemcitabine sensitivity based on high expression of the response marker (hENT1 > 100 amol/ug) and low expression of the resistance marker (RRM1 < 700 amol/ug). 11/97(11%) patients expressed TOPO1 > 1350 amol/ug (75 th percentile of all indications tested by author’s laboratory), suggesting likely response to irinotecan and topotecan. EGFR expression ranged from < 100 amol/ug to > 25000 amol/ug, including overexpression (> 1500 amol/ug) in 22%(21/97) of cases. While expression of EGFR(81/97, 84%) suggested likely response to anti-EGFR ADC, concurrent expression of TUBB3(78/81) may indicate resistance to several known payloads, such as taxanes and MMAE. Conjugation with another payload that targets sensitivity marker TOPO1 (68% expression) is a likely option. Proteomic analysis also revealed detectable levels of multiple RTKs (FGFR(4), AXL(20), IGF1R(10), MET overexpression(1), and HER2 overexpression(2)), indicating potential response to RTK inhibitors. Exploratory investigation in tumor vs TME using proteomics and metabolomics is ongoing. Conclusions: In this population of GBM patients, proteomic analysis identified protein targets of multiple approved and investigational therapies. Gemcitabine, which crosses the blood-brain barrier, may be considered as a salvage option after TMZ failure. Proteomic quantitation of EGFR and TUBB3 may improve patient selection for EGFR-targeting ADCs.