参照物
回指(语言学)
代词
语言学
形容词
计算机科学
名词
名词短语
人称代词
理解力
机制(生物学)
认知
宾语代词
自然语言处理
人工智能
心理学
分辨率(逻辑)
哲学
神经科学
认识论
出处
期刊:Open Journal of Modern Linguistics
[Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.]
日期:2018-01-01
卷期号:08 (02): 9-16
标识
DOI:10.4236/ojml.2018.82002
摘要
When people tend to refer to a previous mentioned discourse entity, they can use various types of anaphoric expressions, such as pronouns, definite noun phrases, proper names or expressions that are introduced by a lexical modifier or a comparative adjective. Among the different types of anaphoric expressions, pronoun is most common and frequently used which contains only a little information about the referent, while definite expressions contain much richer semantic information. As pronouns contain very little information on their own, they are always ambiguous. The cognitive mechanism that underlies the comprehension of pronouns, especially the ones with ambiguities, catches the interests of many researchers. Various tasks have been used to investigate this issue and the results did not go for the same direction. A combination of multiple research methods is needed for a better and deeper understanding of anaphora.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI