医学
随机对照试验
贝叶斯概率
外科
梅德林
麻醉
意向治疗分析
临床试验
子群分析
急诊医学
随机化
护理标准
荟萃分析
作者
Keith Couper,Chen Ji,Charles D Deakin,Rachael T. Fothergill,Rebecca Kandiyali,Jerry P. Nolan,H. Pocock,Michael A. Smyth,Jason V Wiles,Ranjit Lall,Gavin D. Perkins
出处
期刊:Resuscitation
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2026-09-25
卷期号:228: 111335-111335
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111335
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical-effectiveness of an intraosseous-first strategy compared with an intravenous-first strategy in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a pre-planned Bayesian secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC-3 trial. METHODS: In PARAMEDIC-3, adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring vascular access were randomised to either an intraosseous-first strategy or an intravenous-first strategy. In this analysis, we describe the probability that an intraosseous-first strategy was superior or inferior to an intravenous-first strategy, and the probability that this exceeds specific odds ratio thresholds. Our outcomes were 30-day survival (primary), favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation at hospital handover. Our primary analysis used non-informative priors, adjusted for key baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In 6082 randomised participants, the posterior probability that an intraosseous-first strategy improved 30-day survival (odds ratio (OR) > 1.0) was 18.4%. The probability that an intraosseous-first strategy was inferior to an intravenous-first strategy was 81.6% for any effect (OR < 1.0), 55.0% for a small effect (OR < 0.9), and 13.4% for a moderate effect (OR < 0.75). For favourable neurological outcome, findings were comparable to 30-day survival. For return of spontaneous circulation, the posterior probability that an intraosseous-first strategy was inferior to an intravenous-first strategy (OR < 1.0) was 98.0%. CONCLUSION: Based on non-informative priors, which represent minimal prior knowledge of the treatment effect, an intraosseous-first strategy in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is more likely to be harmful, rather than beneficial. However, the low probability of a moderate or large treatment effect suggests that the overall treatment effect is likely to be modest. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14223494.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI