医学
特应性皮炎
荟萃分析
皮肤病科
梅德林
内科学
政治学
法学
作者
Hiroki Murai,Norio Kawamoto,Tomoyuki Arima,Yuki Okada,Haruko Takeuchi,Manabu Miyamoto,Kiwako Yamamoto‐Hanada,Masaki Futamura,Hidehisa Saeki,Yukihiro Ohya
摘要
Topical molecular targeted therapies have recently emerged for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but their efficacy and safety, particularly in children, remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical targeted therapies in children with AD. We conducted a comprehensive search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ICHUSHI databases for articles published up to January 7, 2023, based on a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022366449). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new topical targeted therapies in children (≤18 years) with AD were included. The primary outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included additional efficacy and safety analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4, with bias risk assessed via the RoB 2 tool. Nine studies (reported in eight articles) involving 2182 patients were included, with 1469 children treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib) and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (crisaborole, lotamilast, and difamilast). These interventions significantly improved EASI scores, with the least square mean change (mean difference: -56.67%; 95% confidence interval [-59.16% to -54.18%]). Additionally, topical targeted therapies did not increase the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (risk difference: 0.00; 95% confidence interval [-0.02 to 0.02]). The risk of bias was low across all outcomes. New topical targeted therapies administered over 4 weeks are effective and safe for children with atopic dermatitis aged ≤18 years. Further studies are needed to establish their long-term safety and efficacy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI