磁刺激
物理医学与康复
医学
肌电图
运动(音乐)
刺激
心理学
神经科学
物理
声学
作者
Berry Anderson,Mark S. George
标识
DOI:10.1177/1078390309347372
摘要
BACKGROUND: Early in the development of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research tool, scientists developed the concept of motor threshold (MT) as a method of quantifying dose and establishing safety. Neurophysiologists determined the MT with the aid of peripheral electromyography (EMG). More recently, clinicians started substituting the EMG with observed movements (OM) of the hand or digits. It is unclear whether the two approaches (EMG and OM) reach similar conclusions about an individual’s cortical excitability and when best to use each approach. OBJECTIVE: To review TMS studies directly comparing the EMG and OM MT methods. DESIGN: A systematic search of the literature on Medline from January 1995 through April 2008. RESULTS: Four articles directly compared the two approaches, reaching different and opposing findings. CONCLUSION S : The evidence supporting the substitution of EMG with OM is sparse and conflicting. Clinicians stimulating at or near safety guidelines should use the EMG method.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI