草根
气候变化
持续性
政治学
土生土长的
业务
环境伦理学
环境资源管理
环境规划
经济
生态学
地理
法学
政治
哲学
生物
出处
期刊:Science
[American Association for the Advancement of Science]
日期:2022-06-23
卷期号:376 (6600): 1410-1416
被引量:238
标识
DOI:10.1126/science.abn9668
摘要
Although many governments, financial institutions, and corporations are embracing nature-based solutions as part of their sustainability and net-zero carbon strategies, some nations, Indigenous peoples, local community groups, and grassroots organizations have rejected this term. This pushback is fueled by (i) critical uncertainties about when, where, how, and for whom nature-based solutions are effective and (ii) controversies surrounding their misuse in greenwashing, violations of human rights, and threats to biodiversity. To clarify how the scientific community can help address these issues, I provide an overview of recent research on the benefits and limits of nature-based solutions, including how they compare with technological approaches, and highlight critical areas for future research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI