医学
流产
初潮
优势比
产科
流产
妇科
怀孕
相对风险
甲状腺癌
更年期
队列研究
甲状腺
置信区间
内科学
遗传学
生物
作者
Arathy S. Mannathazhathu,Preethi Sara George,Sreekala Sudhakaran,Durga Vasudevan,K. M. Jagathnath Krishna,Christopher M. Booth,Aleyamma Mathew
出处
期刊:Head & neck
[Wiley]
日期:2019-10-08
卷期号:41 (12): 4199-4208
被引量:28
摘要
Abstract Background Assessed pooled risk on reproductive factors and oral contraceptives (OC) on thyroid cancer (TC) using published studies (1996‐2017). Methods Summary odds ratio (OR) for case‐control studies (n = 10) and risk ratio (RR) for cohort studies (n = 9) was done. Results OR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.16‐1.77) for age at menarche >14 years, 1.49 (95% CI: 1.19‐1.86) for parity >2, 1.38 (95% CI: 1.18‐1.61) for miscarriage/abortion, and 2.05 (95% CI: 1.39‐3.01) for artificial menopause. A protective effect (ORs: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72‐0.99) on TC was observed for prolonged use of OCs. RR was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.90‐1.57) for age at menarche >14 years, 1.10 (95% CI: 0.94‐1.27) for parity >2, 1.20 (95% CI: 1.03‐1.40) for miscarriage/abortion, and 2.16 (95% CI: 1.41‐3.31) for artificial menopause and protective effect (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.65‐0.92) for prolonged use of OCs. Conclusions This meta‐analysis supports an association due to changes in female hormones during menstrual cycle and pregnancy with the risk of TC and explains female preponderance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI