医学
梅德林
医疗保健
过程(计算)
临床实习
医学文献
循证医学
替代医学
医学教育
家庭医学
计算机科学
病理
经济增长
操作系统
经济
法学
政治学
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:1995-12-13
卷期号:274 (22): 1800-1800
被引量:851
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035
摘要
THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE of applied health research is to improve health care. Summarizing the literature to adduce recommendations for clinical practice is an important part of the process. Recently, the health sciences community has reduced the bias and imprecision of traditional literature summaries and their associated recommendations through the development of rigorous criteria for both literature overviews1-3and practice guidelines.4,5Even when recommendations come from such rigorous approaches, however, it is important to differentiate between those based on weak vs strong evidence. Recommendations based on inadequate evidence often require reversal when sufficient data become available,6while timely implementation of recommendations based on strong evidence can save lives.6In this article, we suggest an approach to classifying strength of recommendations. We direct our discussion primarily at clinicians who make treatment recommendations that they hope their colleagues will follow. However, we believe that any clinician who attends to
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI