2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis

医学 多发性肌炎 皮肌炎 风湿病 联合分析 成对比较 物理疗法 痹症科 芯(光纤) 内科学 统计 偏爱 数学 复合材料 材料科学
作者
Rohit Aggarwal,Lisa G. Rider,Nicolino Ruperto,Nastaran Bayat,Brian Erman,Brian M. Feldman,Chester V. Oddis,Anthony A. Amato,Hector Chinoy,Robert G. Cooper,Maryam Dastmalchi,David Fiorentino,David Isenberg,James D. Katz,Andrew L. Mammen,Marjolein Visser,Steven R. Ytterberg,Ingrid E. Lundberg,Leland W.K. Chung,Katalin Dankó
出处
期刊:Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases [BMJ]
卷期号:76 (5): 792-801 被引量:152
标识
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211400
摘要

To develop response criteria for adult dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). Expert surveys, logistic regression, and conjoint analysis were used to develop 287 definitions using core set measures. Myositis experts rated greater improvement among multiple pairwise scenarios in conjoint analysis surveys, where different levels of improvement in 2 core set measures were presented. The PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise Rankings of All Possible Alternatives) method determined the relative weights of core set measures and conjoint analysis definitions. The performance characteristics of the definitions were evaluated on patient profiles using expert consensus (gold standard) and were validated using data from a clinical trial. The nominal group technique was used to reach consensus. Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis-based continuous model using absolute per cent change in core set measures (physician, patient, and extramuscular global activity, muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and muscle enzyme levels). A total improvement score (range 0–100), determined by summing scores for each core set measure, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each core set measure. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were ≥20, ≥40, and ≥60 points in the total improvement score. The same criteria were chosen for juvenile DM, with different improvement thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity in DM/PM patient cohorts were 85% and 92%, 90% and 96%, and 92% and 98% for minimal, moderate, and major improvement, respectively. Definitions were validated in the clinical trial analysis for differentiating the physician rating of improvement (p<0.001). The response criteria for adult DM/PM consisted of the conjoint analysis model based on absolute per cent change in 6 core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
湖月照我影完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Sisi曦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
joilol发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
JamesPei应助谦让的歌曲采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
高骏伟完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
鲤鱼远望发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Avalonx应助忧郁胶手套采纳,获得10
4秒前
研友_nqylan发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
想吃羊肉串完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
无花果应助白露采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
JRF发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
桑格利亚完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
陈A发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Billy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
bajiuc完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI6.3应助白辞采纳,获得10
10秒前
Akim应助怡然奄采纳,获得30
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助jxr采纳,获得10
10秒前
Khronos发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
宾果消消气完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
12秒前
思源应助木mu采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小刘采纳,获得10
14秒前
无私的凛发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
科研通AI6.2应助灵明采纳,获得10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
模型平均及其应用 900
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Structural Analysis 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7351771
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8963204
关于积分的说明 19041046
捐赠科研通 7001013
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3221374
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2385854
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2201812