2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis

医学 多发性肌炎 皮肌炎 风湿病 联合分析 成对比较 物理疗法 痹症科 芯(光纤) 内科学 统计 偏爱 数学 复合材料 材料科学
作者
Rohit Aggarwal,Lisa G. Rider,Nicolino Ruperto,Nastaran Bayat,Brian Erman,Brian M. Feldman,Chester V. Oddis,Anthony A. Amato,Hector Chinoy,Robert G. Cooper,Maryam Dastmalchi,David Fiorentino,David Isenberg,James D. Katz,Andrew L. Mammen,Marjolein Visser,Steven R. Ytterberg,Ingrid E. Lundberg,Lorinda Chung,Katalin Dankó,Ignacio García‐De La Torre,Yeong Wook Song,Luca Villa,Mariangela Rinaldi,Howard E. Rockette,Peter A. Lachenbruch,Frederick W. Miller,Jiří Vencovský
出处
期刊:Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases [BMJ]
卷期号:76 (5): 792-801 被引量:96
标识
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211400
摘要

To develop response criteria for adult dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). Expert surveys, logistic regression, and conjoint analysis were used to develop 287 definitions using core set measures. Myositis experts rated greater improvement among multiple pairwise scenarios in conjoint analysis surveys, where different levels of improvement in 2 core set measures were presented. The PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise Rankings of All Possible Alternatives) method determined the relative weights of core set measures and conjoint analysis definitions. The performance characteristics of the definitions were evaluated on patient profiles using expert consensus (gold standard) and were validated using data from a clinical trial. The nominal group technique was used to reach consensus. Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis-based continuous model using absolute per cent change in core set measures (physician, patient, and extramuscular global activity, muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and muscle enzyme levels). A total improvement score (range 0–100), determined by summing scores for each core set measure, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each core set measure. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were ≥20, ≥40, and ≥60 points in the total improvement score. The same criteria were chosen for juvenile DM, with different improvement thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity in DM/PM patient cohorts were 85% and 92%, 90% and 96%, and 92% and 98% for minimal, moderate, and major improvement, respectively. Definitions were validated in the clinical trial analysis for differentiating the physician rating of improvement (p<0.001). The response criteria for adult DM/PM consisted of the conjoint analysis model based on absolute per cent change in 6 core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Mike001发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
CipherSage应助Yionicbond采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
李什么发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
Mike001发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ye发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
漂亮翅膀发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
Mike001发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Mike001发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
LRRAM_809完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
颠覆乾坤发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
12秒前
滴滴滴发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
漂亮翅膀完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
ding应助先一采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
123444完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
虚拟的若风完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
33秒前
NexusExplorer应助S123采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
充电宝应助滴滴滴采纳,获得10
34秒前
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
aidiresi发布了新的文献求助30
38秒前
勤劳的秋天完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
ww_发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
小玲仔发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
40秒前
我是老大应助科研小帅采纳,获得10
41秒前
辻辰发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
cllj发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
CodeCraft应助aidiresi采纳,获得10
48秒前
49秒前
汉堡包应助优秀的素采纳,获得10
54秒前
jkook完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
MissZhang完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
55秒前
高分求助中
The three stars each : the Astrolabes and related texts 1070
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Sport in der Antike 800
Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure 666
De arte gymnastica. The art of gymnastics 600
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 530
Berns Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2410562
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2105956
关于积分的说明 5320631
捐赠科研通 1833451
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 913598
版权声明 560840
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 488515