Comparison of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and IV (APACHE) Scoring System Validity as Mortality Predictors in ICU Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Sepsis

作者
Akshay Hiryur Manjunatha Swamy,Girish Bandigowdanahalli Kumararadhya,Srinivas Hebbal Thammaiah,Nanda Karikere Siddagangaiah,Shiva Kumar
出处
期刊:Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare [Level Up Business Center]
卷期号:8 (16): 1058-1063
标识
DOI:10.18410/jebmh/2021/204
摘要

BACKGROUND Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) has recently been considered as a defining syndrome of sepsis and is responsible for a high mortality rate among the patients in the intensive care units (ICUs). Prognostication of the ICU patients is an integral part of the management of the critically ill patients and many scoring systems, for that matter, have been devised and compared for their efficiency at predicting mortality. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the validity of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and APACHE IV as mortality predictors in intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from MODS in sepsis. METHODS Hundred patients diagnosed with MODS in sepsis were carefully examined, followed by relevant laboratory investigations. The SOFA score was calculated daily, and the APACHE II and IV scores were calculated on the day of admission. The scores were further compared among the survivors and the non-survivors, followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the SOFA D1, D2, and D3 and the APACHE II and IV scores to estimate their capability of mortality prediction. RESULTS The means of the APACHE II, IV and SOFA D1 were 16.57 ± 6.49, 71.91 ± 16.19 and 8.75 ± 2.20, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean APACHE II scores (14.23 ± 5.20 vs. 21.12 ± 6.38) and the mean APACHE IV scores (67.27 ± 13.21 vs. 80.91 ± 17.77) in the survivors and the nonsurvivors. A statistically significant difference was also evident in the mean ages of the survivors and the non-survivors (52.82 ± 14.67 years vs. 63.25 ± 16.98 years). The SOFA score was high among the non-survivors than the survivors right from day-1 (10.24 ± 2.08 vs. 7.98 ± 1.86) to day-20 (15.00 ± 0.00 vs. 3.14 ± 0.38). Furthermore, ROC analysis showed that the best discrimination was provided by SOFA D3 followed by the APACHE II and SOFA D1 scores, with APACHE IV score showing the least. CONCLUSIONS SOFA score on day 3 provides the best mortality prediction in patients with MODS in sepsis, as compared to APACHE II and IV scores. KEYWORDS SOFA, APACHE II, APACHE IV, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome, Sepsis

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LLL完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
科研人发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
深情安青应助wys采纳,获得10
刚刚
迷路的灵波应助qq1033312015采纳,获得10
刚刚
福娃娃完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
今后应助qq1033312015采纳,获得10
刚刚
西奥牧马完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
自由灵安完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
刘小岩发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
顺心致远完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
打打应助鱼儿爱学习吧采纳,获得10
1秒前
冶金人发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
没有昵称完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
fg2477发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Orange应助曲奇曲奇采纳,获得10
3秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
youth应助明月朗晴采纳,获得10
4秒前
斑比完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
认真幼萱发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
情怀应助kingripple采纳,获得10
4秒前
kd1412完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
沈冷发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
教授完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
坚强的之槐完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
虚幻听安完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
风之旅完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
闪闪又菱完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
LLL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
转山转水转出了自我完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
拼搏宛儿完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
kylin完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
适配Micro-LED色转换的高兼容性量子点负性光刻胶制备与工艺研究 500
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 500
Vander's Renal Physiology第10版 500
Rocket Propulsion Elements, 10th Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7305787
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8923854
关于积分的说明 18905590
捐赠科研通 6968830
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3212298
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2381011
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2189709