Comparison of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and IV (APACHE) Scoring System Validity as Mortality Predictors in ICU Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Sepsis

作者
Akshay Hiryur Manjunatha Swamy,Girish Bandigowdanahalli Kumararadhya,Srinivas Hebbal Thammaiah,Nanda Karikere Siddagangaiah,Shiva Kumar
出处
期刊:Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare [Level Up Business Center]
卷期号:8 (16): 1058-1063
标识
DOI:10.18410/jebmh/2021/204
摘要

BACKGROUND Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) has recently been considered as a defining syndrome of sepsis and is responsible for a high mortality rate among the patients in the intensive care units (ICUs). Prognostication of the ICU patients is an integral part of the management of the critically ill patients and many scoring systems, for that matter, have been devised and compared for their efficiency at predicting mortality. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the validity of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and APACHE IV as mortality predictors in intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffering from MODS in sepsis. METHODS Hundred patients diagnosed with MODS in sepsis were carefully examined, followed by relevant laboratory investigations. The SOFA score was calculated daily, and the APACHE II and IV scores were calculated on the day of admission. The scores were further compared among the survivors and the non-survivors, followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the SOFA D1, D2, and D3 and the APACHE II and IV scores to estimate their capability of mortality prediction. RESULTS The means of the APACHE II, IV and SOFA D1 were 16.57 ± 6.49, 71.91 ± 16.19 and 8.75 ± 2.20, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean APACHE II scores (14.23 ± 5.20 vs. 21.12 ± 6.38) and the mean APACHE IV scores (67.27 ± 13.21 vs. 80.91 ± 17.77) in the survivors and the nonsurvivors. A statistically significant difference was also evident in the mean ages of the survivors and the non-survivors (52.82 ± 14.67 years vs. 63.25 ± 16.98 years). The SOFA score was high among the non-survivors than the survivors right from day-1 (10.24 ± 2.08 vs. 7.98 ± 1.86) to day-20 (15.00 ± 0.00 vs. 3.14 ± 0.38). Furthermore, ROC analysis showed that the best discrimination was provided by SOFA D3 followed by the APACHE II and SOFA D1 scores, with APACHE IV score showing the least. CONCLUSIONS SOFA score on day 3 provides the best mortality prediction in patients with MODS in sepsis, as compared to APACHE II and IV scores. KEYWORDS SOFA, APACHE II, APACHE IV, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome, Sepsis

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
喜悦芫发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
依心完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
在水一方应助浸染层林采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
大胆小松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
凡君发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
无敌辉儿发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
清脆三德完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Freya1528应助Siri采纳,获得30
3秒前
爆米花应助小yy采纳,获得10
4秒前
freya发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
韩程果发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
燕双鹰完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
早追光完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
热沙来提发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
复仇者红红完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
patrickcj发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
arniu2008应助炙热念双采纳,获得20
6秒前
zychaos完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
daslicht发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
aajhajkahna应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
悲伤tomato应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
刘龙应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
zhou完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
虚幻帽子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7764446
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9308652
关于积分的说明 20307206
捐赠科研通 7349118
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3314390
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2463914
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2328561