背景(考古学)
公司治理
公共经济学
实证研究
投资(军事)
透视图(图形)
研究政策
业务
经济
政治学
公共行政
管理
政治
计算机科学
古生物学
哲学
认识论
人工智能
法学
生物
标识
DOI:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1370
摘要
Administrative capacities are required to give effect to policy instruments. While seemingly obvious, policy research has, as yet, not systematically linked these two perspectives. The policy instrument perspective emerged in the context of implementation research and the wider debate about changing modes of governance. Administrative capacities and resources always played a role in this research, but cumulative empirical exploration or theory building has remained underdeveloped. A stronger integration of administrative capacity perspectives into research on policy instruments is essential so as to progress our understanding regarding the choice, design, and operation of policy instruments. A stronger policy orientation in research on administrative capacities can help to address limitations of indicator-based studies of capacity, which currently dominate empirical research on administrative capacities. The design and choice of policy instruments has an effect on administrative capacities: Capacity-reinforcing policies can be distinguished from capacity-undermining ones. A challenge for future research is under which conditions will politicians invest in administrative capacities, an investment that will only yield (uncertain) positive outcomes in the medium term.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI