The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in the Treatment of Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Anlotinib, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor targeting angiogenesis and tumor proliferation pathways, has shown promising efficacy in various cancers. Its role in treating thyroid cancer, particularly radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), is of significant clinical interest. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib in patients with thyroid cancer, analyzing outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rates, and adverse events. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to October 2023. The review included randomized controlled trials and prospective studies assessing Anlotinib in thyroid cancer patients. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Six studies involving a total of 277 patients were included. In patients with RAIR-DTC, Anlotinib demonstrated significant improvement in median PFS and objective response rates. In advanced or metastatic MTC, Anlotinib significantly prolonged median PFS compared to placebo, with high objective response rates. Subgroup analyses showed that older patients and those with bone metastases benefited significantly from Anlotinib treatment. In patients with ATC, Anlotinib-based chemotherapy yielded a 60% objective response rate. Anlotinib was also effective as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced thyroid cancer, achieving an objective response rate of 76.9%. Common adverse events included hypertension, proteinuria, and palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, which were generally manageable. Conclusions: Anlotinib appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with various types of thyroid cancer, providing significant improvements in PFS and objective response rates. Further large-scale randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to explore long-term outcomes.