多样性(政治)
包裹体(矿物)
工程伦理学
代表(政治)
人口
临床试验
动物福利
人类研究
医学
政治学
心理学
环境伦理学
法学
社会心理学
病理
生物
环境卫生
工程类
政治
哲学
生态学
标识
DOI:10.1136/jme-2023-109166
摘要
Translation failure occurs when a treatment shown to be safe and effective in one type of population does not produce the same result in another. We are currently in a crisis involving the translatability of preclinical studies to human populations. Animal trials are no better than a coin toss at predicting the safety and efficacy of drugs in human trials, and the high failure rate of drugs entering human trials suggests that most of the suffering of laboratory animals is futile, creating no commensurate benefit for human patients. Here, I argue that animal ethics committees have a role to play in getting us out of this crisis. Inadequate representation is a known contributor to translation failures and is a matter of both scientific and ethical concern. Ethical review committees have the authority to address it by reprioritising the values already enshrined in their guiding principles.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI