Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension

医学 败血症 重症监护医学 麻醉 内科学
作者
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical Trials Network
出处
期刊:The New England Journal of Medicine [Massachusetts Medical Society]
卷期号:388 (6): 499-510 被引量:337
标识
DOI:10.1056/nejmoa2212663
摘要

BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluids and vasopressor agents are commonly used in early resuscitation of patients with sepsis, but comparative data for prioritizing their delivery are limited. METHODS: In an unblinded superiority trial conducted at 60 U.S. centers, we randomly assigned patients to either a restrictive fluid strategy (prioritizing vasopressors and lower intravenous fluid volumes) or a liberal fluid strategy (prioritizing higher volumes of intravenous fluids before vasopressor use) for a 24-hour period. Randomization occurred within 4 hours after a patient met the criteria for sepsis-induced hypotension refractory to initial treatment with 1 to 3 liters of intravenous fluid. We hypothesized that all-cause mortality before discharge home by day 90 (primary outcome) would be lower with a restrictive fluid strategy than with a liberal fluid strategy. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1563 patients were enrolled, with 782 assigned to the restrictive fluid group and 781 to the liberal fluid group. Resuscitation therapies that were administered during the 24-hour protocol period differed between the two groups; less intravenous fluid was administered in the restrictive fluid group than in the liberal fluid group (difference of medians, -2134 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2318 to -1949), whereas the restrictive fluid group had earlier, more prevalent, and longer duration of vasopressor use. Death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 occurred in 109 patients (14.0%) in the restrictive fluid group and in 116 patients (14.9%) in the liberal fluid group (estimated difference, -0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 2.6; P = 0.61); 5 patients in the restrictive fluid group and 4 patients in the liberal fluid group had their data censored (lost to follow-up). The number of reported serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with sepsis-induced hypotension, the restrictive fluid strategy that was used in this trial did not result in significantly lower (or higher) mortality before discharge home by day 90 than the liberal fluid strategy. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CLOVERS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03434028.).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
PPD发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
JamesPei应助歡禧采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
Awei完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
英俊的铭应助Chamo采纳,获得10
4秒前
PPD发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
mzhmhy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
忽悠老羊发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
laz完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
正午的火车站完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
rong完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
刘树魁发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
乐空思举报狂野的雨灵求助涉嫌违规
13秒前
15秒前
科目三应助rong采纳,获得10
15秒前
sci_fp完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
皮皮发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
鲤鱼大神发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
埋头赶路发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
harden9159完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
火星上的菲鹰举报董晴求助涉嫌违规
21秒前
黄垚发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
葛稀完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
will_li完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
24秒前
自信的芝麻完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
科研通AI6.2应助fang20130608采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
陈文思完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
黄垚完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
方沅完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Radical Reactions 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7367162
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8975207
关于积分的说明 19081181
捐赠科研通 7011005
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3224293
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2387902
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2205058