ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing Chat Are Large Language Processing Models That Answered Orthopaedic In‐Training Examination Questions With Similar Accuracy to First‐Year Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

骨科手术 医学 医学物理学 普通外科 计算机科学 外科 医学教育
作者
Gage Guerra,Hayden L. Hofmann,Jonathan L. Le,Alexander Wong,Amir Fathi,Cory K. Mayfield,Frank A. Petrigliano,Joseph N. Liu
出处
期刊:Arthroscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:41 (3): 557-562 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.023
摘要

PURPOSE: To assess ChatGPT's, Bard's, and Bing Chat's ability to generate accurate orthopaedic diagnoses or corresponding treatments by comparing their performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) with that of orthopaedic trainees. METHODS: OITE question sets from 2021 and 2022 were compiled to form a large set of 420 questions. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), Bard, and Bing Chat were instructed to select one of the provided responses to each question. The accuracy of composite questions was recorded and comparatively analyzed to human cohorts including medical students and orthopaedic residents, stratified by postgraduate year (PGY). RESULTS: ChatGPT correctly answered 46.3% of composite questions whereas Bing Chat correctly answered 52.4% of questions and Bard correctly answered 51.4% of questions on the OITE. When image-associated questions were excluded, ChatGPT's, Bing Chat's, and Bard's overall accuracies improved to 49.1%, 53.5%, and 56.8%, respectively. Medical students correctly answered 30.8%, and PGY-1, -2, -3, -4, and -5 orthopaedic residents correctly answered 53.1%, 60.4%, 66.6%, 70.0%, and 71.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing Chat are artificial intelligence (AI) models that answered OITE questions with accuracy similar to that of first-year orthopaedic surgery residents. ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing Chat achieved this result without using images or other supplementary media that human test takers are provided. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our comparative performance analysis of AI models on orthopaedic board-style questions highlights ChatGPT's, Bing Chat's, and Bard's clinical knowledge and proficiency. Our analysis establishes a baseline of AI model proficiency in the field of orthopaedics and provides a comparative marker for future, more advanced deep learning models. Although in its elementary phase, future AI models' orthopaedic knowledge may provide clinical support and serve as an educational tool.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Austin发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
zzg发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
领导范儿应助houniao采纳,获得10
6秒前
白昼の月完成签到 ,获得积分0
6秒前
CharlesRoue完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
wangsai0532完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
吕如音发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
玄轩小悟风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
旷野完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
张777粒粒发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Richard完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
houniao发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
songfeifeng完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
吕如音完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
Kkkkkkkk发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
香蕉觅云应助感动花卷采纳,获得10
18秒前
shishuang完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
害怕的冰颜完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
落寞萤发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
希希完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
我是老大应助修哥采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
Chloe完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
Austin完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
三清小爷完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
感动花卷发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
boxi完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
一减完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
研友_La17wL完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
33秒前
安风完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
影子发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
感动花卷完成签到,获得积分20
38秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les chinois de jakarta: temples et vie collective 1000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
基于锂离子电池正极材料回收的绿色溶剂开发及工程化应用研究 800
Social Psychology 600
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7646152
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9218446
关于积分的说明 19778162
捐赠科研通 7210540
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3276969
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2438624
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2275032