Proactive advance care planning conversations in general practice: a quality improvement project

对话 认知重构 预先护理计划 玛丽·居里 医学 质量(理念) 质量管理 焦点小组 医疗保健 医学教育 护理部 心理学 缓和医疗 运营管理 业务 政治学 工程类 社会心理学 哲学 营销 管理制度 法学 认识论 经济政策 沟通 欧洲联盟
作者
Tabitha Winnifrith,Catherine Millington‐Sanders,Emma Husbands,Jane Haros,Helen Ballinger
出处
期刊:BMJ open quality [BMJ]
卷期号:13 (3): e002679-e002679 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002679
摘要

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of discussion, reflection and communication, enabling planning for future medical treatment. Despite evidence of benefits of ACP to patients, families and the healthcare system, many die without an opportunity for such conversations, particularly those living with progressive non-malignant conditions. The Royal College of General Practitioners and Marie Curie Daffodil Standards launched in 2020 provide primary care with a structure for improving end-of-life care, including delivery of ACP. Proactive identification of patients is integral to the approach.We report on a quality improvement project which aimed to assess the take-up rate and acceptability in general practice of a timely and personalised ACP conversation using a 'What matters to you' (WMTY) framework, and to ensure that different diagnostic and demographic groups were included.Patients without previous ACP and potentially in the last year of life were offered an ACP conversation; a survey sought feedback.81% accepted the offer and in most cases, future care guidance was documented using the recognised format in Gloucestershire for recording ACP conversations, the Recommended Summary for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) plan. Clinician and patient satisfaction was high.We concluded that an ACP discussion using a 'WMTY' format was highly acceptable to most. With recognised enablers in place and known barriers minimised, valuable personalised conversations occurred. Reframing the conversation to focus on how someone wants to live, while including their priorities for death, could alter how such conversations are perceived by clinicians and the public. It could remove negative associations (such as linking these conversations with an imminent death), which may increase motivation for all to initiate discussions.ACP conversations are evidenced best practice and could become routine in general practice with adjustments to practice processes and clinician education; the Daffodil Standards facilitate continued quality improvement.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
欣然完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
充电宝应助辉辉采纳,获得10
刚刚
jnb完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
王俊洁完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
cxt发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
hhhhhhhh发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
微笑妖妖发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
猫猫睡觉觉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
阳佟水蓉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助哦呵采纳,获得30
8秒前
亭曈发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
SciGPT应助涂涂采纳,获得10
10秒前
阳光的傲柏完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
zhou完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
思思发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
qqqqq完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
纯情的寒松发布了新的文献求助100
14秒前
15秒前
言语完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
Wells应助元谷雪采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
Rewi_Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
liarliar38发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
CipherSage应助想人陪的万言采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
852应助小呆鹿采纳,获得10
23秒前
烟花应助琪琪采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
科研通AI2S应助纪云海采纳,获得10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
2016 Venous Blood Study (VBS) (Final V3.0) 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7704045
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9262167
关于积分的说明 20035493
捐赠科研通 7279516
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3294742
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2449945
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2301486