Risk Prediction Models for Sarcopenia in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Haemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

检查表 系统回顾 肌萎缩 荟萃分析 医学 数据提取 批判性评价 观察研究 置信区间 风险评估 预测建模 梅德林 重症监护医学 内科学 统计 病理 心理学 计算机科学 替代医学 计算机安全 数学 政治学 法学 认知心理学
作者
Qing Yang,Wenting Ji,Julan Guo,Han Fu,Hang Li,Jing Gao,Chaoming Hou
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jocn.17755
摘要

The number of risk prediction models for sarcopenia in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) is increasing. However, the quality, applicability, and reporting adherence of these models in clinical practice and future research remain unknown. To systematically review published studies on risk prediction models for sarcopenia in patients undergoing MHD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Search relevant domestic and international databases, which were searched from the inception of the databases until November 2023. The Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist was used to extract data. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. The Transparent Reporting of a Multivariate Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) was used to assess the reporting adherence. A total of 478 articles were retrieved, and 12 prediction models from 11 articles were included after the screening process. The incidence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing MHD was 16.38%-37.29%. The reported area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.73 to 0.955. All studies had a high risk of bias, mainly because of inappropriate data sources and poor reporting in the field of analysis. The combined AUC value of the six validation models was 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.87-0.94), indicating that the model had a high discrimination. Although the included studies reported to some extent the discrimination of predictive models for sarcopenia in patients undergoing MHD, all studies were assessed to have a high risk of bias according to the PROBAST checklist, following the reporting guidelines outlined in the TRIPOD statement, and adherence was incomplete in all studies. CRD42023476067.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
帅气鹭洋完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
77发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
6秒前
77完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
12秒前
淡然的冰薇完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
冰魂应助水三寿采纳,获得20
16秒前
wowser发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
conny完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
默默地读文献应助JIA采纳,获得20
20秒前
赘婿应助淡然的冰薇采纳,获得10
22秒前
wowser完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
雨夜星空应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
Pothos应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
26秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
难过大神完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
jnuszjz完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
我是老大应助海峰荣采纳,获得10
35秒前
Shabby0-0完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
qyzhu完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
CodeCraft应助粉色的小天鹅采纳,获得10
42秒前
nicolaslcq完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
44秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mindfulness and Character Strengths: A Practitioner's Guide to MBSP 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3776730
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3322167
关于积分的说明 10208975
捐赠科研通 3037401
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1666647
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 797622
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 757921