DPYD公司
伊立替康
医学
基因分型
优势比
肿瘤科
毒性
结直肠癌
内科学
置信区间
基因型
药物遗传学
化疗
药理学
癌症
生物
遗传学
基因
作者
Giuseppe Toffoli,Federico Innocenti,Jerry Polesel,Elena De Mattia,Franca Sartor,Chiara Dalle Fratte,Fabrizio Ecca,Eva Dreussi,Elisa Palazzari,Michela Guardascione,Angela Buonadonna,Luisa Foltran,Marica Garziera,Alessia Bignucolo,Stefania Nobili,Enrico Mini,Adolfo Favaretto,Massimiliano Berretta,Mario D’Andrea,Antonino De Paoli
摘要
Lack of information on the clinical utility of preemptive DPYD screening before fluoropyrimidine treatment is a major barrier preventing its use in clinical practice. This study aimed to define the association between DPYD variants and fluoropyrimidine‐related toxicity management costs. A cost analysis was conducted on the toxicities experienced by 550 patients with colorectal cancer treated with fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy. Genotyping for DPYD *2A , DPYD *13 , DPYD c. 2846A>T , DPYD ‐HapB3 , and UGT 1A1*28 was done retrospectively and did not affect patients’ treatments. Carriers of at least one DPYD variant experienced higher toxicity management costs (€2,972; 95% confidence interval (CI), €2,456–€3,505) than noncarriers (€825; 95% CI, €785–€864) ( P < 0.0001) and had a higher risk for toxicity requiring hospitalization (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.87–9.14). In patients receiving fluoropyrimidine/irinotecan, the incremental cost between DPYD variant and UGT 1A1*28/*28 carriers and noncarriers was €2,975. This study suggests that the toxicity management costs during fluoropyrimidine‐based therapy are associated with DPYD and UGT 1A1*28 variants and supports the utility of genotyping.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI