霍根
消费主义
食物权
政治学
法学
欧洲联盟
立法
政治
法律与经济学
业务
经济
社会学
粮食安全
国际贸易
农业
生物
人类学
生态学
作者
Kai P. Purnhagen,Josephine van Zeben,Christiane Ahlborn,Peter Oosterveer
出处
期刊:European Law Review
[Definitive International Institute of Life Science (DIILI Publication)]
日期:2020-08-01
卷期号:45 (4): 553-568
标识
DOI:10.13140/rg.2.2.23221.42721
摘要
In Case C-363/18 Organisation juive europeenne, Vignoble Psagot Ltd v Ministre de l’Economie et des Finances (“Occupied Territories case”), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or Court) was tasked with deciding what information on its country of origin or place of provenance is mandatory for business according to existing European legislation. This casenote summarizes the interpretative decisions taken by the Advocate General Hogan (Advocate General or AG) and the Court in their opinion and judgment, respectively. It then considers the broader implications of this case from several perspectives: first, from the perspective of political consumerism and its (potential) role in EU internal market law; second, from the perspective of the enforcement of international law; and third, from the perspective of the coherence of EU food and consumer law including its behavioural dimension.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI