Contrasted concentrations of neonicotinoids in human hair and urine suggest long-term vs short-term exposure in two observational studies, international academics and rural population of the Philippines.
作者
Kumiko Taira,Kazutoshi Fujioka,Alexandre Aebi,Gaétan Glauser,Edward A. D. Mitchell,Yoshinori Ikenaka,Francisco Sánchez‐Bayo,Andrea Tapparo,Elizabeth Lumawig-Heitzmann,Jean‐Marc Bonmatin,Anton Safer,Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond,Florencia G. Claveria,Yoshiko Aoyama,Yuichi Miyabara,Makiko Komori
Abstract Neonicotinoid insecticides, the most widely used category of insecticides for 20 years and candidate risk of neurodevelopment, have been detected in human urine and in hair. If the former reflecting dietary contamination over short periods and the latter total exposure over longer periods is not known. We quantified and compared the concentrations in spot urine by LC-MS/MS and in hair by UHPLC-MS/MS.In the first study, samples from an international group of scientists in Italy in 2016 (M/F=12/7),detection rate in urine and in hair was 0% vs 85.0% for imidacloprid; 0% vs 52.5% for thiacloprid; 0% vs 45.0% for acetamiprid; 0% vs 25.0% for thiamethoxam; and 0% vs 17.5% for clothianidin.In the second study, samples from 99 volunteers in three islands of the Philippines in 2017,detection rate in urine and in hair was 48.5% vs 60.6% for imidacloprid; 1.0% vs 8.1% for thiacloprid; 10.1% vs 13.1% for acetamiprid; 31.3% vs 30.3% for thiamethoxam; and 14.1% vs 45.5% for clothianidin. In the Philippine, concentrations were negatively correlated between urine and hair for thiamethoxam (r = -0.70, p = 0.016), but not for clothianidin or imidacloprid. Both analyses of urine and hair are complementary to assess human neonicotinoid exposure.