医学
内科学
肿瘤科
卡培他滨
生活质量(医疗保健)
曲妥珠单抗
耐火材料(行星科学)
拉帕蒂尼
乳腺癌
胃肠病学
癌症
结直肠癌
天体生物学
物理
护理部
作者
Tanja Fehm,F. Cottone,K. Dunton,Fabrice André,Ian E. Krop,Y.H. Park,Michelino De Laurentiis,Yasuo Miyoshi,Anne Armstrong,Manuel Ruíz Borrego,Rinat Yerushalmi,François P. Duhoux,Toshimi Takano,Wenjun Lü,C. Livings,Anton Egorov,S-B Kim
出处
期刊:ESMO open
[Elsevier]
日期:2023-05-01
卷期号:8 (1): 101375-101375
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101375
摘要
In DESTINY-Breast02 (NCT03523585), T-DXd improved progression-free and overall survival vs TPC in pts with HER2+ mBC who were resistant/refractory to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) (Krop et al. SABCS 2022). Here, we report data on PROs and health-related quality of life (QoL). Pts with HER2+ (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization amplified) T-DM1–resistant/refractory mBC were assigned 2:1 to T-DXd or TPC (trastuzumab + capecitabine or lapatinib + capecitabine). PROs were collected and measured at prespecified timepoints using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ)-C30, the breast-cancer–specific EORTC QLQ-BR45 (scored as EORTC QLQ-BR23), and the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) visual analog scale. Change from baseline (CFB) and time to definitive deterioration (TDD) were assessed. QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL score was the primary variable of interest. In the T-DXd (n = 406) and TPC (n = 202) arms (median treatment duration of the safety analysis set: 11.3 vs ∼4.5 mo), questionnaire compliance was >92% at baseline and >76% at cycles 3-29. Mean CFB of GHS/QoL remained stable (within ±10 points) up to cycle 39 for T-DXd and cycle 21 for TPC, after which the number of pts on treatment was not informative (n < 10%). Median TDD was longer with T-DXd vs TPC for GHS/QoL (14.1 vs 5.9 mo; HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.44-0.71]) and for all measured QLQ-C30 subscales, including physical functioning (18.7 vs 6.8 mo; HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.36-0.60]) and pain (18.7 vs 5.8 mo; HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.29-0.49]), with the exception of nausea/vomiting (5.7 vs 6.1 mo; HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.86-1.39]). With T-DXd vs TPC, pts experienced prolonged TDD on the QLQ-BR23 arm symptom subscale (18.3 vs 8.8 mo; HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.44-0.75]). Mean CFB in GHS/QoL suggested that overall health and QoL were maintained in T-DXd-treated pts. TDD was longer on all measured QLQ-C30 subscales, except for nausea/vomiting, for pts receiving T-DXd vs TPC. These results continue to support the benefit of T-DXd in pts with T-DM1–resistant HER2+ mBC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI