Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

异丙酚 医学 镇静 麻醉 耐受性 恶心 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 不利影响 外科 内科学
作者
Yu‐Tzu Chang,Yun‐Ting Huang,Kuan‐Yu Chi,Yen‐Ta Huang
出处
期刊:PeerJ [PeerJ, Inc.]
卷期号:11: e15495-e15495 被引量:67
标识
DOI:10.7717/peerj.15495
摘要

Background: To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with "metafor" package with random-effects model. Results: A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14-0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22-0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14-0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15-2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53-1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03-0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups. Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONV, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022362950.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
KNK发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
3082发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
xkky发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
Gameven完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
优秀的冬衣的应助被谦让曼寒采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
情怀的应助被玩家666采纳,获得10
4秒前
自然靖易发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
泊宁完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
星辰大海的应助被刘l采纳,获得10
6秒前
慕新发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
刘亮亮完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Yvonne发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
优秀的冬衣的应助被xiaoju采纳,获得10
7秒前
英俊的铭的应助被小HIN采纳,获得10
8秒前
柴胡完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
CipherSage的应助被NJK采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
Maize Man发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
Gary完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
Owen的应助被Youyou采纳,获得10
11秒前
无花果的应助被Y1sci采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
顾矜的应助被KKK的科研采纳,获得10
12秒前
kang的应助被机智若之采纳,获得10
12秒前
余漪完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
美好善斓完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
笨笨琪完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
顾矜的应助被玩家666采纳,获得10
13秒前
乐空思的应助被Jaysmith001采纳,获得300
14秒前
李健的应助被xhgxfh采纳,获得10
14秒前
AMONRE的应助被哈哈哈嗝采纳,获得10
15秒前
卡皮巴拉发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Stell & Maran's Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8030020
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9469641
关于积分的说明 21238853
捐赠科研通 7600034
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3388455
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2520761
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2425236