Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

微生物群 医学 母乳 随机对照试验 益生菌 母乳喂养 人口 置信区间 荟萃分析 生理学 内科学 生物 儿科 环境卫生 生物信息学 生物化学 遗传学 细菌
作者
Bekalu Kassie Alemu,Getnet Gedefaw,Ling Wu,So Ling Lau,Chi Chiu Wang,Yao Wang
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (11): 101148-101148 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101148
摘要

OBJECTIVE The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. DATA SOURCES The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. METHODS Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. RESULTS The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). CONCLUSION Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health. The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
打打应助多情的冥王星采纳,获得50
刚刚
浅浅殇发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
shirley发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
安河桥发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
QQ完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
现实的语兰完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
dillo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
宋锐完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
凡事发生必有利于我完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
咩咩羊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
大模型应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
3秒前
亮司发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
领导范儿应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
3秒前
充电宝应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
玉玉完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
英姑应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
4秒前
华仔应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
4秒前
传奇3应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
烟花应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
stife32应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得10
4秒前
深情安青应助靓丽的觅荷采纳,获得30
4秒前
予Yu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
任性曼青发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
现实的薯片完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
安河桥完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
新八完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
czj完成签到,获得积分0
6秒前
锦葵科的棉花完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wangxu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
高分求助中
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Organic Reactions Volume 118 400
A Foreign Missionary on the Long March: The Unpublished Memoirs of Arnolis Hayman of the China Inland Mission 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6460468
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8269321
关于积分的说明 17627004
捐赠科研通 5530334
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2906250
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1883056
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1728480