亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

微生物群 医学 母乳 随机对照试验 益生菌 母乳喂养 人口 置信区间 荟萃分析 生理学 内科学 生物 儿科 环境卫生 生物信息学 生物化学 遗传学 细菌
作者
Bekalu Kassie Alemu,Getnet Gedefaw Azeze,Ling Wu,So Ling Lau,Chi Chiu Wang,Yao Wang
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (11): 101148-101148 被引量:47
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101148
摘要

OBJECTIVE The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. DATA SOURCES The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. METHODS Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. RESULTS The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). CONCLUSION Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health. The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
5秒前
9秒前
11秒前
17秒前
无语发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
今后应助无语采纳,获得10
31秒前
好运来完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
46秒前
蒸一下完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
Ava应助野生稻米采纳,获得10
48秒前
韦老虎发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
无语发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
56秒前
仓颉发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
隐形曼青应助无语采纳,获得10
1分钟前
仓颉完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
海盐黑胡椒123完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Lx030324发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
欧皇发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Ayanam1完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
无语发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Ma完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Hello应助无语采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
无语发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Owen应助Zcl采纳,获得10
2分钟前
欧皇发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
小蘑菇应助无语采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
栀鸢发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
song完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1500
VALIDATION OF THE TAYLOR, ALAMEL AND VPSC MODELS FOR PLASTIC ANISOTROPY MODELING OF SHEET METALS 1000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
Middleton's Allergy Principles and Practice 10th Edition(Middleton's Allergy 2-Volume Set, 10th Edition) 1000
Resistance Spot Welding Dataset for Automobile Body-in-White Quality Analysis 748
日本現代怪異事典 副読本 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7400621
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9005429
关于积分的说明 19171687
捐赠科研通 7034761
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3231053
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2393213
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2212737