Improving Trust in AI with Mitigating Confirmation Bias: Effects of Explanation Type and Debiasing Strategy for Decision-Making with Explainable AI

借记 确认偏差 认知偏差 可信赖性 计算机科学 认知 认知心理学 心理学 人工智能 知识管理 社会心理学 神经科学
作者
Taehyun Ha,Sangyeon Kim
出处
期刊:International Journal of Human-computer Interaction [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:: 1-12 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1080/10447318.2023.2285640
摘要

AbstractWith advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), explainable AI (XAI) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing the explainability of complex machine learning models. However, the explanations generated by an XAI may lead to cognitive biases among human users. To address this problem, this study aims to investigate how to mitigate users’ cognitive biases based on their individual characteristics. In the literature review, we found two factors that can be helpful in remedying biases: 1) debiasing strategies that have been reported to potentially reduce biases in users’ decision-making via additional information or change in information delivery, and 2) explanation modality types. To examine these factors’ effects, we conducted an experiment with a 4 (debiasing strategy) × 3 (explanation type) between-subject design. In the experiment, participants were exposed to an explainable interface that provides an AI’s outcomes with explanatory information, and their behavioral and attitudinal responses were collected. Specifically, we statistically examined the effects of textual and visual explanations on users’ trust and confirmation bias toward AI systems, considering the moderating effects of debiasing methods and watching time. The results demonstrated that textual explanations lead to higher trust in XAI systems compared to visual explanations. Moreover, we found that textual explanations are particularly beneficial for quick decision-makers to evaluate the outputs of AI systems. Next, the results indicated that the cognitive bias can be effectively mitigated by providing users with a priori information. These findings have theoretical and practical implications for designing AI-based decision support systems that can generate more trustworthy and equitable explanations.Keywords: Artificial intelligenceexplanationtrustsatisfactioncognitive bias Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the faculty research fund of Sejong University in 2023.Notes on contributorsTaehyun HaTaehyun Ha is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Data Science at Sejong University. His research focuses on Online User Behavior, Human-AI Interaction, and Trust Formation.Sangyeon KimSangyeon Kim is a research professor at the Institute of Engineering Research at Korea University. He received a PhD from the Department of Interaction Science at Sungkyunkwan University in 2022. His research interests include human-computer interaction, gestural interaction, accessible computing, and human-centered AI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
123444发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
小马甲应助宏哥采纳,获得10
刚刚
2秒前
彭于晏应助Yihong采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
重要忆秋完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wnnnp关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
www完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
枫林摇曳发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Watson完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
肉卷子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
英姑应助逆位迷宫采纳,获得10
5秒前
搞怪的青旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
jignjing发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
机智剑封完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
活泼的飞扬完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
天天快乐应助yyl采纳,获得10
6秒前
Six_seven发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
假如可以重来完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
吉师大_科研完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
钉钉完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
wanci应助还单身的老虎采纳,获得10
9秒前
zozox完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
范黎明完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
肯德基没有黄焖鸡完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
Orange应助qishiyy采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
科研通AI6应助May采纳,获得10
11秒前
yiyi发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
冬冬完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
研究生end应助碎落星沉采纳,获得20
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
“Now I Have My Own Key”: The Impact of Housing Stability on Recovery and Recidivism Reduction Using a Recovery Capital Framework 500
PRINCIPLES OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS Microeconomics & Human Behavior 400
The Red Peril Explained: Every Man, Woman & Child Affected 400
The Social Work Ethics Casebook(2nd,Frederic G. Reamer) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5024326
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4261408
关于积分的说明 13281423
捐赠科研通 4068273
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2225249
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1233992
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1157939