召回
心理学
内部一致性
等级间信度
计分系统
规范性
判别效度
可靠性(半导体)
心理测量学
临床心理学
发展心理学
认知心理学
评定量表
医学
认识论
物理
哲学
外科
功率(物理)
量子力学
作者
Lisa J. Rapport,Richard A. Charter,Robin L. Dutra,Todd J. Farchione,John J. Kingsley
标识
DOI:10.1080/13854049708407028
摘要
Abstract This study computes and compares interrater and internal consistency reliabilities of the Lezak and Denman scoring systems using three independent raters (N = 318; copy and recall phases). In general, interrater and internal consistency reliabilities for both scoring systems were high and equivalent. Based on the levels of discriminant indices, one item in the recall phase of both scoring methods failed to meet inclusionary criteria for scale retention. However, exclusion of the item would not meaningfully improve the reliability of either system; therefore, no changes in the present protocols are warranted. Selection of scoring method should be based on criteria such as availability of appropriate normative data, cost, or time in scoring.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI