埃索美拉唑
医学
内科学
耐受性
阿莫西林
幽门螺杆菌
胃肠病学
克拉霉素
随机对照试验
肝病学
门诊部
药物治疗
意向治疗分析
抗生素
不利影响
微生物学
生物
作者
Aya Ahmed,Gehan F. Balata,Hany M. Elsadek,Mohamed Nour EL-Din,Ahmed Mostafa Amin
标识
DOI:10.26452/ijrps.v11ispl4.4437
摘要
The prevalence of antibiotic resistance has considerably increased and as a result, the elimination pace of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection have decreased significantly to an unacceptable level. High dose dual therapy (HDDT) has been suggested as an alternative to standard triple therapy (TT) for the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection. The aim of the present work was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of HDDT with standard TT, for treatment of H. pylori infection. This randomized parallel interventional study was carried out on 130 treatment naïve H. pylori infected patients, selected from outpatient clinic of Hepatology and Gastroenterology department of Zagazig University Hospitals, in the duration between November 2017 and December 2018. All patients were H. pylori positive as was evidenced by stool antigen test. Patients were divided into two groups; group A (n=65) received a 14-day HDDT (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1 g three times daily) whereas group B (n=65) received a 14-day TT (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg, each administered twice daily). Eradication rates, side effects and drug compliance were compared among both groups. The eradication rate between the two regimens was not significantly different. The eradication rates were 80% for TT and 72.3% for HDDT (P= 0.3). No significant differences were observed between both groups regarding the side effects or patient adherence. HDDT is as effective and safe as TT as empiric first-line therapy for H pylori infection.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI