德尔菲法
缓和医疗
德尔菲
护理部
利克特量表
医学
白皮书
家庭医学
医学教育
心理学
计算机科学
政治学
操作系统
发展心理学
人工智能
法学
作者
Orla Keegan,Irene Murphy,Inger Benkel,Joaquín T. Limonero,Marilyn Relf,Mai‐Britt Guldin
标识
DOI:10.1177/02692163211043000
摘要
The WHO definition of palliative care includes bereavement support as integral to palliative care, yet a previous survey of bereavement support in palliative care in Europe has shown a range of service responses to loss. A rigorous approach to agreeing and implementing a palliative care bereavement framework was required.The aim of this study was to develop consensus on best-practice recommendations for bereavement care principles, structures, processes and delivery based on current practice and evidence.In accordance with Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies, a consensus-building five-round Delphi technique was performed. A scoping review of research literature informed drafting of 54 statements by the EAPC Bereavement Task Force. Evaluation of the statements was performed by an expert panel using a 5-point Likert scale. ⩾80% agreement were defined as essential items and 75%-79% agreement were defined as desirable items. Items with a consensus rating <75% were revised during the process.The Delphi study was carried out by an expert panel among membership organisations of the European Association for Palliative Care.In total, 376 email requests to complete Delphi questionnaire were distributed with a response rate of 23% (n = 87) and a follow-up response-rate of 79% (n = 69). Of the initial 54 statements in six dimensions, 52 statements were endorsed with 26 essential statements and 26 desirable statements.The six dimensions and 52 statements agreed through this Delphi study clarify a coherent direction for development of bereavement services in palliative care in Europe.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI