Femoral Neck System Compared with 3 Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 60 and Older

医学 股骨颈 外科 骨质疏松症 内科学
作者
Zachary Mallon,Heather A. Prentice,Adam M. Schlauch,Brian H. Fasig,Elizabeth W. Paxton,Cameron Sadeghi,Kanu Okike
出处
期刊:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume [Wolters Kluwer]
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.24.00781
摘要

Background: While the Femoral Neck System (FNS) is increasingly utilized for the fixation of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, studies comparing the device to the historical standard (that is, multiple cannulated screws) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of all-cause revision following fixation with the FNS device compared with multiple cannulated screws in patients ≥60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture. Methods: Patients ≥60 years of age who underwent fixation of a femoral neck fracture with the FNS or 3 cannulated screws (2017 to 2022) were identified using the Kaiser Permanente Hip Fracture Registry. Exclusion criteria were polytrauma, pathologic fracture, open fracture, additional surgeries at other sites during the same hospital stay, and prior procedures on the affected hip. The primary outcome measure was all-cause revision surgery, and the secondary outcome measures were mortality, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards or logistic regression was performed, controlling for a wide range of potential confounders. Results: A total of 352 FNS and 1,686 cannulated-screw repairs were included. The overall incidence of revision at 2 years was 4.0% and 4.8% for the FNS and cannulated-screw constructs, respectively. Mortality at 2 years was 23.6% and 25.2%, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, no difference in all-cause revision risk was observed when comparing the FNS to cannulated screws (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 1.71; p = 0.79). A subgroup analysis of procedures performed by surgeons who used both devices also did not demonstrate a difference in revision rates (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.39 to 2.17; p = 0.84). Conclusions: In this study of patients ≥60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture, the rates of all-cause revision and mortality were found to be similar between the FNS and multiple cannulated screws. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
在水一方应助汎影采纳,获得10
刚刚
爆米花应助FFSGF采纳,获得10
2秒前
jj完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Michaelialzm完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
7秒前
科研通AI5应助竹心蜓采纳,获得30
10秒前
hahaha完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
hu完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
why发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
小二郎应助不万能测光表采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
Terry完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
hu发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
狂野静曼发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
22秒前
阿健完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
汎影发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
五更夜发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
胡梅13完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
竹心蜓发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
俏皮的傲云完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
传奇3应助红花牌凯塞路采纳,获得10
26秒前
san完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
胡梅13发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
27秒前
28秒前
29秒前
张张完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
卡卡西应助zhinian28采纳,获得10
30秒前
WSQ2130发布了新的文献求助70
30秒前
pluto应助zhang005on采纳,获得10
31秒前
万能图书馆应助jy采纳,获得10
32秒前
高分求助中
Chinesen in Europa – Europäer in China: Journalisten, Spione, Studenten 500
Arthur Ewert: A Life for the Comintern 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi // Kurt Werner Radtke 500
Two Years in Peking 1965-1966: Book 1: Living and Teaching in Mao's China // Reginald Hunt 500
Epigenetic Drug Discovery 500
Hardness Tests and Hardness Number Conversions 300
Knowledge management in the fashion industry 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3816929
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3360303
关于积分的说明 10407548
捐赠科研通 3078290
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1690694
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 813990
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 767958