Femoral Neck System Compared with 3 Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 60 and Older

医学 股骨颈 外科 骨质疏松症 内科学
作者
Zachary Mallon,Heather A. Prentice,Adam M. Schlauch,Brian H. Fasig,Elizabeth W. Paxton,Cameron Sadeghi,Kanu Okike
出处
期刊:Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:107 (9): 958-967 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.24.00781
摘要

Background: While the Femoral Neck System (FNS) is increasingly utilized for the fixation of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, studies comparing the device to the historical standard (that is, multiple cannulated screws) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of all-cause revision following fixation with the FNS device compared with multiple cannulated screws in patients ≥60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture. Methods: Patients ≥60 years of age who underwent fixation of a femoral neck fracture with the FNS or 3 cannulated screws (2017 to 2022) were identified using the Kaiser Permanente Hip Fracture Registry. Exclusion criteria were polytrauma, pathologic fracture, open fracture, additional surgeries at other sites during the same hospital stay, and prior procedures on the affected hip. The primary outcome measure was all-cause revision surgery, and the secondary outcome measures were mortality, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards or logistic regression was performed, controlling for a wide range of potential confounders. Results: A total of 352 FNS and 1,686 cannulated-screw repairs were included. The overall incidence of revision at 2 years was 4.0% and 4.8% for the FNS and cannulated-screw constructs, respectively. Mortality at 2 years was 23.6% and 25.2%, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, no difference in all-cause revision risk was observed when comparing the FNS to cannulated screws (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 1.71; p = 0.79). A subgroup analysis of procedures performed by surgeons who used both devices also did not demonstrate a difference in revision rates (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.39 to 2.17; p = 0.84). Conclusions: In this study of patients ≥60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture, the rates of all-cause revision and mortality were found to be similar between the FNS and multiple cannulated screws. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
落后听寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
勤奋羽毛完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
夏侯初完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
星沐易发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
李李亮发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
aaaa的应助被畔畔采纳,获得100
3秒前
Owen的应助被Wendy采纳,获得10
3秒前
Hi完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
shirley完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
asdf完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
YAYING完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
刘雪松完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
诸葛朝雪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
蓝天的应助被忧虑的冬莲采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
海纳斯关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
Rainlistener完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
cherry完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Gurlstrian发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
知性的新之完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大军门诊发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
zlt完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
研友_Lw4Ngn完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
phil完成签到,获得积分0
14秒前
乐乐的应助被大智若愚啊采纳,获得10
15秒前
单竹完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
婉约清扬完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
小蘑菇的应助被勤奋羽毛采纳,获得50
19秒前
Hello的应助被单竹采纳,获得10
19秒前
77完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
The Dawn of Philology 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (4th ed.) 310
中国器官捐献和移植发展报告(2024) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7820806
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9348088
关于积分的说明 20545390
捐赠科研通 7413691
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3332859
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2478803
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2352974