The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 心理干预 荟萃分析 物理疗法 相对风险 随机对照试验 严格标准化平均差 系统回顾 梅德林 置信区间 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Monique V. Wilson,F BRAITHWAITE,John B. Arnold,S. Crouch,Emily Moore,Alrun M. Heil,Kay Cooper,Tasha R. Stanton
出处
期刊:Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:165 (12): 2698-2720 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293
摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
guyujuan完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
烟花应助静谧采纳,获得10
1秒前
小阳科研发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
共享精神应助肘子采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
科研通AI6.2应助zzy采纳,获得30
3秒前
loverdose完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Research完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
今后应助shenl采纳,获得10
4秒前
回首之时完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
shiny发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
牛肉面应助F2022采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
禾袅完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
李健应助开心的秋寒采纳,获得10
5秒前
噢噢噢噢完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助hkh采纳,获得10
5秒前
漪涙应助hkh采纳,获得10
5秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助hkh采纳,获得10
6秒前
hehe完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
漪涙应助hkh采纳,获得10
6秒前
美好师完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
adalove完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
de铭发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
李小刀完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助zhinian28采纳,获得10
7秒前
emma完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Steven完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
香蕉觅云应助专一的善愁采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
挤爆沙丁鱼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
ginchuodan发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
CodeCraft应助二十采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
HyAcinTH发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6437339
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8251778
关于积分的说明 17556460
捐赠科研通 5495593
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2898466
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1875258
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1716270