异三聚体G蛋白
G蛋白偶联受体
蛋白质亚单位
G蛋白
螺旋(腹足类)
生物
结构生物学
生物化学
化学
计算生物学
受体
生态学
基因
蜗牛
作者
Javier García-Nafría,Christopher G. Tate
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2019.02.006
摘要
Advances in electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) now permit the structure determination of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins by single-particle imaging. A combination of G protein engineering and the development of antibodies that stabilise the heterotrimeric G protein facilitate the formation of stable GPCR-G protein complexes suitable for structural biology. Structures have been determined of GPCRs coupled to either heterotrimeric G proteins (Gs, Gi or Go) or mini-G proteins (mini-Gs or mini-Go) by single-particle cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography, respectively. This review describes the technical breakthroughs allowing their structure determination and compares the different techniques. In addition, we compare the structures of GPCRs coupled either to Gs, Gi or Go and analyse the contributions of amino acid residues to the GPCR-G protein interface. There is no unique set of interactions that specifies coupling either to Gs, Gi or Go. Instead, there is a common core of interactions between the C-terminal α-helix of the G protein α-subunit and helices H3, H5 and H6 of the receptor. In addition, there are varying degrees of interaction between all the other GPCR helices and intracellular loops to five regions of the α-subunit and four regions of the β-subunit. These data support the contention that there is not a simple linear barcode that defines the specificity of G protein coupling and thus how a G protein couples to a GPCR cannot currently be determined from simply analysing amino acid sequences. Although the overall architecture of GPCR-G protein complexes is conserved, there are significant differences in the molecular details. The number and type of molecular interactions between amino acid residues at the interfaces varies, resulting in subtly different orientation and position of the G protein with respect to the GPCR. This in turn affects the interface surface area that varies between 845 Å2 and 1490 Å2, which could impact upon the lifetime of signalling complexes in the cell.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI