会计
公司治理
激励
估价(财务)
业务
会计信息系统
投资(军事)
盈余管理
收益
审计
质量(理念)
情感(语言学)
财务
经济
心理学
政治学
认识论
哲学
政治
沟通
微观经济学
法学
作者
Stefano Cascino,Mark Clatworthy,Beatriz García Osma,Joachim Gassen,Shahed Imam
标识
DOI:10.2308/tar-2019-1030
摘要
ABSTRACT We examine how investment professionals assess the usefulness of financial accounting information depending on their information acquisition objectives and preparers' earnings management incentives. We conduct a survey experiment based on face-to-face interviews with investment professionals and document two main results. First, we find that, compared with investment professionals assigned a firm valuation objective, those assigned a managerial performance evaluation objective assess accounting information as significantly less useful. Second, we find no systematic evidence that preparers' earnings management incentives negatively affect investment professionals' assessments of accounting information usefulness. To elucidate this second finding, we conduct a large-scale follow-up online experiment. Our results continue to offer no support for the effect of earnings management incentives on investment professionals' assessments of accounting information usefulness, irrespective of preparers' corporate governance quality. Instead, we find that poor corporate governance, by itself, reduces the usefulness of accounting information to investment professionals. JEL Classifications: G15; G18; G38; M41; M48.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI